Organizers without email
@MHorsey-WMF
When organizers don't have an email address on their account, they get this message 'To message participants, you'll need an email address on your account. Add email.' The 'Add email' text is hyperlinked to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences for them to add their emails.

@MHorsey-WMF The design links here T325058 contains the success message, can you confirm if these are the same links you have been using?

In T322332#8663991, @ldelench_wmf wrote:

According to this guidance they triage requests in 5 working days, but it's unclear to me when the actual review would happen - though in my experience they are pretty fast. If it's reasonably simple to update with our decisions from yesterday, please go ahead - seeing the updated wireframes will probably make their reviews easier.

In T322332#8662374, @ldelench_wmf wrote:

@gonyeahialam Do you think we should update the designs at this point? Our next steps will be to seek approval from Legal/Trust & Safety, and I'm happy to just share the acceptance criteria to avoid rework if they request changes.

In T322332#8635335, @ldelench_wmf wrote:

---

For the profession question, it makes sense why "profession" would provide more relevant information to organizers than "sector."
Do you envision an open text field for this one @gonyeahialam ? I haven't found a precedent for this in the wikimedia universe yet, but it seems like a dropdown list for all the professions in the world would be very long and unwieldy to maintain.

What do you recommend for this one @gonyeahialam?:

• Are we going with "Sector" instead of "Profession"? And what are the list options?

• "Do you belong to any Wikimedia chapters, organizing partners or affiliate organizations?" - we are NOT building a list for participant to select from; we will make it a open text field.

In T322332#8619569, @ldelench_wmf wrote:

@gonyeahialam @cmelo it sounds like there are some concerns around allowing multiple selections for "what is your gender?" Are you recommending that we make these answers radio buttons, so that only one choice is permitted? If so, I will bring this recommendation to Legal/T&S for approval.

I have added the prototype to the description @Daimona

Since there is no longer a side widget beside the event details, I suggest having the organizer list by the side on desktop to take advantage of the horizontal space as shown below. What do you think @Daimona?

In T315577#8516199, @cmelo wrote:

In T315577#8515957, @gonyeahialam wrote:

@cmelo when entering a username, can we validate the username as soon as the organizer presses enter?

Hi @gonyeahialam, I need to check it, but just to confirm, by validate, you mean check if the username is valid (is a real user)?

@cmelo when entering a username, can we validate the username as soon as the organizer presses enter?

@Daan.L You can add the mobile views to this task when you are done.

• What are the "draggable" icons for? Should organizers be allowed to order questions? This is not trivial to implement. It's doable, but wondering if it'd be worth the effort (i.e., if there's a specific use case for it).

The icons are for organizers to reorder questions but it isn't a necessary feature for now.

Thanks for the feedback @Daimona @cmelo

In T322343#8443106, @Daimona wrote:

Looks good overall, I think the second proposal might be easier to implement, and it would also mean that organizers and non-organizer have almost the same flow for registering. With the first option, I'm a bit worried about adding more things to the registration form (which is already quite long), and the CTA in the table (what if organizer doesn't want to add info, potential issues with a11y and pagination, etc.).

@Daimona

• I don't understand what "sector" is for

Sector refers to the field in which the participant works. We are looking at using either profession or sector but it seems it would be easier to create a dropdown list of sectors than one that covers all professions.

In T322332#8436417, @cmelo wrote:

Thanks, @gonyeahialam!

One thing I noticed is that it is not clear that the user needs to scroll down to see the other questions, so I would make the scroll visible when needed.

Can you provide a screenshot of the headings? They should be standard H1/H2 but I think they are styled by the echo extension rather than our code.

Early ideas
Organizers are able to add multiple locations and for each location they can add multiple dates/times

In T318369#8428594, @MHorsey-WMF wrote:

@gonyeahialam are you happy with that?

Some feedback on slack on Idea 2:
It is very heavy with text/information and it encourages people to register privately (when we ideally want most people to be nudged to register publicly).

@Daimona The calendar icon is the final icon. Is there any reason why the font sizes of the headings are quite huge?

@ifried I have created T323984 to explore solutions

In T321614#8403887, @ifried wrote:

I have updated the AC to say "ended" rather than "closed."

Yes, we need design input on what the user should see when the event ended (rather than just 'You are attending'). When we get the design input, it can be a separate ticket, but it does not need to be a blocker for this ticket being marked as Done.

Pinging @gonyeahialam and @Daan.L so they see this. Thanks!

@vaughnwalters @MHorsey-WMF The title in the explainer text is supposed to be lighter in color than the toggle switch label. This was done purposely to create a hierarchy and distinction between the two headings and reduce confusion.

@vaughnwalters We have this task to tackle the discrepancies T318165

@MHorsey-WMF a few notes:
Public registration and Private registration should be bold

comp:

build:

@Daimona @vaughnwalters The timezone for 'If user logged out: default time zone of wiki' just shows the offset and not the full timezone, it should be UTC, UTC+01:00, UTC+02:00. Just writing the offset doesn't tell the user what timezone it is.
Also, the Timezone heading font weight is medium, not bold. and should have the same color/opacity of the 'Start date and time' heading

@Daimona @vaughnwalters The timezone for 'If user logged out: default time zone of wiki' just shows the offset and not the full timezone, it should be UTC, UTC+01:00, UTC+02:00...
Also, the Timezone heading font-weight is medium, not bold.

Two ideas for solving this:

@Daimona I am adding the More details dialog to this because I noticed the style for the headings/subheadings of the different sections has not been updated yet

Current design	What is implemented betalabs

Event details