I can see @thiemowmde's concerns, but I also see the trouble with using at-ease. As a compromise, it might be worthwhile changing at-ease to follow a more functional style:

@toan Which of the two patches should be reviewed? Are they still WIP (if not, you should publish them for review in Gerrit).

As this never really got anywhere, let's abandon this (at least for the foreseeable future).

Just a note for the future: While the individual dump run recovered and eventually produced a dump, the cron itself (which was supposed to start other RDF dump flavours afterwards) got killed.

I tagged the release now, so we only need to update the submodule in Wikibase now.

Seems this automatically recovered :)

This still needs the release preparation patch to be merged (https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/wikibase/javascript-api/+/596231), then we can tag it (while doing that, we should also tag the past 3.1.1 release as that was forgotten back then). After that, the subcomponent can be bumped in Wikibase and we should be good here.

I just created a one-off script for getting the items the above items conflict with: https://gist.github.com/mariushoch/ae4538741ec3e5409dfa4e9a90c346dc.

The rebuild items per site run finished. Sadly the following 2,738 items produced errors, where one or more of their sitelinks could not be saved to the table (typically because the sitelink is already recorded for another item):