User Details
- User Since
- Jun 26 2019, 5:29 PM (157 w, 2 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- IFried (WMF) [ Global Accounts ]
Yesterday
There is nothing user-facing in this ticket, so I'm marking this as Done.
There is nothing user-facing here, so I'm marking this as Done.
There is nothing user-facing here, so I'm marking this as Done.
I'm neutral on the question above. I agree that the icon may not be necessary since the row title is "Number of participants." So we will await response from @gonyeahialam to see what he thinks and learns more about the background on the icons.
Thu, Jun 30
Thank you for the update, @vyuen!
Thank you so much, @BPirkle -- that's great news!
@ldelench_wmf Hey there! Since we will need to begin planning V1, we would find a way to unblock this conversation (which has been stalled). Maybe it is a topic we can discuss in our 1:1 next week. Thanks!
This has been finalized
A few notes/questions for @Daimona based on feedback from Jacqui (UX writer):
- Is there a reason that some error messages have capitalization in the beginning and then there is a second version that does not? For example, there is "create event registrations" and "Create event registrations" --> if not, we should fix this inconsistency
- We have inconsistency with periods. If there is a full sentence, it should have a period at the end. If needed, I can add another comment with all of the lines that need periods at the end (will require some time for me to go through).
- I still see that "physical" rather than "in person" is used in a few places, but that will be fixed in a separate ticket, right?
- When does the user encounter campaignevents-desc? I would need to know this in order to determine if we change the text in any way because it is a bit unclear how it is used/who it is for at the moment.
- Jacqui recommended that we change text from negative (i.e., what the user did wrong) to positive (i.e., the correct behavior). This would mean we do the following:
- Change "The event page title cannot be empty" to "Enter an event page title with at least 1 character.”
- Change "The event start time is invalid" to "Enter a valid start time for the event."
- Change "The event end time is invalid" to "Enter a valid end time for the event."
- Jacqui recommended changing the word "integer" with "number" so we should do the following:
- Change "The event ID must be a positive integer" to "The event ID must be a positive number." --> what do you think? is this okay, or is this not good, since this text is really for technical people, so they would want to see the word "integer"?
Wed, Jun 29
Hello @BPirkle. This is currently a blocker for the Campaigns team as we work on building a registration tool. Would it be possible for you or someone on the API Platform team to check the ticket out? Thank you in advance!
Mon, Jun 27
@cmelo Would adding user_name column to the ce_participants be a separate ticket, and do you imagine it would be a large amount of work? If yes, perhaps we can estimate it separately and it can be worked on shortly after other V0 tickets are completed. If it's a smaller amount of work, we can see if we can include it in V0. I'll await engineering input before we consider next steps.
@Daimona: Yes; thanks for catching that! I have updated the acceptance criteria.
Thanks for bringing this up! I think that:
Fri, Jun 17
Okay, slight language tweak:
@Daimona, does this work?:
Thu, Jun 16
@matmarex Hello! Apologies if you're very busy, but I just wanted to quickly ping you to see if you have had any chance to look at the questions from @Daimona above. Any insights would be quite helpful for the Campaigns team. Also, if there is anyone else you recommend we talk to on this topic, we would love to know. Thank you in advance!
I have talked to @Daimona and I now understand the problem. My preferences for how to resolve the issue are as follows:
@Daimona and @vaughnwalters I recommend that the following messages:
This has been resolved
@Daimona Apologies, I am a bit confused by the behavior you are describing. Perhaps we can jump on a quick call today or tomorrow?
@Daimona I think it is good to keep 'close' in the kebab menu, even if it brings you to 'edit,' since users may not know how to close events otherwise.
@Daimona, you are referring to this message, right?
Wed, Jun 15
@Daimona Thanks for bringing this up. I'm trying to remember where the AC for "Notification modal should appear: "[name of event] closed" even came from, but I just don't remember. @gonyeahialam do you remember, or do you know what is the suggested behavior after event registration is closed in terms of notifying the user?
@Daimona If someone deletes registration, I think it makes sense for the registration listing to be immediately removed from the list. Hiding the event to remove it immediately sounds good to me.
@Daimona Hello! What number of points would you estimate this ticket as? Thanks in advance!
For V0, we decided that the title of the campaign event will be a link to the EventDetails page.
@Daimona Thanks for clarifying! I can run it by Legal, but I would need to provide them a detailed explanation of when/how people would encounter this message in the documentation. Can you share some details with me? Once I have the info, I can ping Legal.
@Daimona Yes, I think it makes sense for add a notice to mw:Extension:CampaignEvents/Api, so that people will still acknowledge the terms of use and privacy policy if they do not register via the UI. When you wrote, "Unsure if we can have an official response from Legal though," what are you referring to? Apologies, I'm a bit confused. Thanks.
Tue, Jun 14
The final name selections can be found in T310201.
Thanks; I have updated one of the messages to now read: "There is no event page with this name."
Mon, Jun 13
I will write my personal preferences below, but we will need feedback from Gregory:
Hey everyone. There are a few questions and comments going on here. I'll try to summarize them below:
Thank you so much, @gonyeahialam! This new version has a description of the user ("You are an organizer") and of the action ("Event page: Enable on-page registration so participants can register for your event directly on the page"). Is there any reason that the new version has this additional text, but the old version only had the "Enable Registration" link? Is it so that there isn't arbitrary white space with the addition of the "Enable Registration" button below the title? Also, one quick language note: It seems a bit redundant to say "on-page registration" and "directly on the page." If we decide to keep the additional language, maybe we can just use "directly on the page" since it seems more clear?
@Jacqui.Clydesdale Thank you for the feedback on "Please." I understand what you mean about how "please" can soften the messaging. Since you recommended a mix, do you think our current mix of when we use "please" and when we don't looks good to you? As a side note, I do wonder if it may be nice to have consistent language (and, therefore, we should omit "please"). Do you have any general recommendations on the importance of language consistency? I'm often inclined to go for consistency, but I'm certainly open to other opinions.
@ifried I think this makes sense, since admins in Mediawiki can delete the pages, and we shouldn't exclude core admins rights and functionalities from the event experience. Meanwhile, we want event creators to be able to delete their own events. This way, they can easily manage their events with minimal hassle.
@Daimona Yes! We should be stating "Cancel your registration" rather than "unregister." Does this change need to be represented in a separate ticket, or no?
Fri, Jun 10
Okay, thanks @Daimona. We will await a response from @gonyeahialam.
@CKMIE89 Thank you for clarifying! We then have 2 follow-up questions:
@gonyeahialam: Hello! We currently need feedback on T309337 to unblock this ticket. Please check it out when you get the chance and respond to the question that I posted. Thank you!