This work is complete, as multiple design concepts have been developed. @JFernandez-WMF can attach some info on what was accomplished and then we can formally close this ticket.

This work has been deprioritized, so let's add any explorations that have already been developed as a comment and then move this ticket out of the sprint board.

Thank you so much for this investigation, @cmelo! This is fantastic and very exciting :)

This is now working as expected.

This is now working as expected.

Follow-up ticket created, so this work can now be marked as done: T423355.

Follow-up tickets created, so this work can now be marked as done: T423353 and T423352.

This investigation is complete, and we return to these designs if we later develop an event mode. For now, we have decided to focus on worklist support rather than event mode as a way to both improve the user experience of collaborative contributions, while also opening up possibilities for promoting events to new audiences. I'm marking this work as done.

This investigation is complete. For now, we have decided to prioritize adding number of references added/removed. Thank you for this work!

Thanks, @Isaac! Makes sense.

@MHorsey-WMF, I know this investigation is still in progress, but I have one question right now: If the Micro-Task Generator can quickly generate the topics/tasks/quality associated with the article, why can't we?

Let's do option 1 (don't show references data for older events)

Thanks for looking into this, @MHorsey-WMF! This is very helpful, and it's exactly the reason we wanted to do quick prototypes of our ideas (so we can see which ones work and which ones straight-up do not or kind-of do not!). So, with that in mind, I have two follow-up questions:

The add an edit button is no longer displaying for closed events. This work is done.