User Details
- User Since
- Jun 26 2019, 5:29 PM (246 w, 5 d)
- Availability
- Available
- LDAP User
- Unknown
- MediaWiki User
- IFried (WMF) [ Global Accounts ]
Yesterday
Thanks for these updates, @gonyeahialam!
Fri, Mar 15
This has been released and I have seen it live on some events with translated subpages, so I am marking this as Done.
This has been released, so I'm marking it as Done.
Thanks for your feedback, @kostajh! Would @Tchanders be responsible for making the final decision?
Thu, Mar 14
This ended up not happening, so I am closing this ticket.
Wed, Mar 13
Awaiting feedback on how to handle the scenarios described above, so this is blocked until we confirm the correct behavior.
I have discussed this with @cmelo, and we both think that Option 1 is the best choice for a few reasons, which are:
Mon, Mar 11
I am closing this task as Resolved. An analysis was conducted on how we may potentially get data on user preference around email notifications, specifically so we could try to analyze opt out rates of event participants who received emails from event organizers. The finding was that it is possible, but the work would be quite complex. For now, we are not prioritizing any analysis of organizer email behaviors when using event registration, so I am marking this task as Resolved since the extent of the analysis that we needed was completed.
This is not a priority for the team to work on now, but we may pursue it later, so I'll leave the task open.
While we may look into this in the future, we have no immediate product need for this work, so I am closing this task.
We did not prioritize this ticket as we took a different direction with our event discovery research. We may want to analyze the impact of CentralNotice in the future, but this work is no longer a high priority item for the Campaigns team so I am marking it as declined and closing this ticket.
@gonyeahialam If an organizer adds a question, and then some participants answer the question, and then they remove the question, and then if the organizer re-adds the question (perhaps because they made a mistake when they removed it or change their mind about removing it) before the event ends, I think it makes sense to retain & display the data of the responses from the participants who previously answered the question, since the organizer has again decided that this question should be included and the participants chose to answer the question.
Fri, Mar 8
@gonyeahialam: What I mean in the AC is that, if an organizer removes a question before an event ends, and then if they decide to add back the question before the event ends, they should be able to see the answers to that question shared by participants before they initially removed that question.
Thu, Mar 7
This task can be closed, as the work to establish campaigns baseline data is done.
We established the campaign activity baseline, so I am closing this task as resolved.
We have no plans to work on this right now, so I will close this task and create a new one if priorities change.
The work that we ended up using for analysis and insights is done, so I am closing this task.
Wed, Mar 6
Hello, @Tchanders & @Niharika! I'm wondering who would be the best person to respond to the product question brought up in the above comment as a result of the investigation. Thanks in advance!
Tue, Mar 5
Hello, @gonyeahialam! I was just discussing this ticket with @Daimona, and he brought up the idea of perhaps including the information on changes in a separate section at the bottom (between 'your information' and 'data retention information.' What do you think? And perhaps you can create an example visual of this too, and then can we share all of the visual examples with internal stakeholders to get their feedback on the visual presentation and language? Thanks!
Assigning to @cmelo, since I heard he is working on this (and correct me if I am wrong, please!)
@Daimona Yes, done.
Yup, I'll close this; thanks!