@Nuria : Have you read the meeting notes mentioned above? To my naive eye, they seem to contain some of the types of questions you asked for earlier. If they're not what you're looking for, then iIt might be helpful to have a meeting with an analyst and/or researcher, to help others understand the kinds of questions that would be particularly meaningful.
Fri, Sep 15
Is that the same as just changing the types of those Epic tags to instead be Goal tags?
This task is kind of done, kind of in progress, and kind of declined. I'll go with declined, since in the end it's unlikely that I will create 3 slides as it was written.
@mmodell : With that form, would we leave the other dropdown set to "Public", even for private tasks?
Thu, Sep 14
Perhaps @EBjune could say if either of the workarounds seem feasible.
FY2017/18 Technology Program 3: Addressing technical debt
@JAufrecht : That's a typo on my part. Product Programs 7 and 8 are for fundraising, not for search. PP1 and X-SDC.2 are the only search platform programs. I'll fix the description.
This is a new report for a program, not for a team.
Wed, Sep 13
Historical note: I believe at the time Phlogiston was designed, conduit did not expose transaction data for moving a task between columns within a project. I don't know if conduit supports this now.
This was mentioned in Scrum-of-scrums. Who would actually do the work to get it migrated?
I tried adding an alternative hashtag and it didn't help.
@JAufrecht : Perhaps eventually phlogiston could pull data via conduit instead of relying on nightly db dumps?
Tue, Sep 12
Mon, Sep 11
From my perspective, the most urgent need is for: Tech Programs. That's pretty easy: if you own (or co-own) a program (or, I would argue, a sub-program), you would be on the list. Plus presumably me, Joel, and Victoria. Not sure if any eng-admin folks would need to be on that one. There are a couple tech manager who would not be on that list by that criterion, so maybe it should be tech-mgt PLUS non-manager program owners. The "co-own" part would be to include our Product Managers, in cases where the eng lead is listed as the primary owner.
Fri, Sep 8
@JAufrecht : Which working group? We spawned 3 at about the same time.
@Neil_P._Quinn_WMF : This task is part of a quarterly goal, so we would like it to be fully resolved before the end of September. Thanks!
Wed, Sep 6
Tue, Sep 5
@mmodell : Is this something you could take care of?
Fri, Sep 1
Not worth going back and doing this for July. In October, our quarterly checkin will already be program-centric.
The Audiences department is working on an "interlocks" guidance document which may cover some of this.
Wed, Aug 30
Victoria has retracted this request. Any replacement work that comes my way can go in a new task.
Tue, Aug 29
@Tbayer : Do you have a status update on this? Thanks!
@Qgil. I'm fine taking over *a* task (or fleet of tasks). This one seems oddly multi-purposed to me.
Planning is underway, as mentioned in a "Heads up" email from Victoria Coleman. Rachel is taking on the primary logistics work, and we are forming a Program Committee which will be responsible for the content. I am helping facilitate that committee's formation and work.
Mon, Aug 28
Aug 25 2017
I vote for d) As b, but throw an error if the string is anything other than "resolved".
Aug 24 2017
Thanks @Aklapper . I have passed those along so the Working Group can process them.