Does this mean the award is not going to be given this year?

Hi @KinneretG: I just want to confirm that you saw my comments that I added to the document in the shared drive last week. They're just stylistic so no problem if you missed them.

I think there are actually two distinct issues here:

Yeah, it sure looks like something invalid in the database. Check out the continuation string which is all �: https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allrevisions&arvprop=ids|timestamp&arvdir=newer&arvlimit=1

In T225270#5395141, @leila wrote:

@mako re making the program page, I messaged (on Telegram) KcVelaga - Krishna per Liam's recommendation. Let's see if they can do it. If not, you or I will do it.

I think it would be more surprising to have the same SHA1 for two different (in any way) revisions than it would to have a SHA1 that reflects something other than the SHA1 of the primary/historical content field. So I guess I like the revision-level
<sha1> reflecting the hash of all parts of the revision.

The GPL defines source as the "preferred form for modification" and
minified-JS is clearly not that.