Fri, Jan 24
I submitted https://github.com/addwiki/wikibase-api/pull/57 to remove the clear parameter from addwiki/wikibase-api/src/Api/Service/RevisionSaver.php as it isn't needed to remove a statement.
Thu, Jan 23
Tue, Jan 21
For the addwiki part talk to @Addshore he's the maintainer of the addwiki code
Found the culprit in vendor/addwiki/wikibase-api/src/Api/Service/RevisionSaver.php :
// Always clear so that removing elements is possible
$params['clear'] = 'true';
Mon, Jan 20
I'm using the Addwiki library to save a new revision. The data that is sent to the API can be found in P10226 (was a lot of information, so a paste would be better than dumping it in here. (As serialized by the Addwiki library)
Sun, Jan 19
Something else was wrong, scripts now work again while the CSP message still shows in the browser console.
Thu, Jan 2
Have been able to reproduce it (or better my bot):
18-12 00:00 UTC / 19-12 00:00 UTC / 21-12 12:00 UTC / 23-12 00:00 UTC / 26-12 12:00 UTC / 27-12 12:00 UTC / 28-12 00:00 UTC / 28-12 12:00 UTC / 31-12 12:00 UTC / 01-01 12:00 UTC / 02-01 00:00 UTC
So it seems there is some datapolution on 1 or a few database servers that provide the triples for the Wikidata Query Service. And it doesn't look like it will be solved automatically.
Dec 24 2019
@jhsoby What is the opinion of the LangCom? I see an IETF and an Ethnologue code in the item about the language.
Dec 21 2019
@AyushBasral Why did you close this ticket? The code doesn't work and I don't see a final LangCom decision.
Dec 19 2019
Also reproduced December 18th and December 19th 12AM UTC.
Dec 16 2019
Dec 10 2019
Indeed it works fine: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q4115189&oldid=1073803719
But when entering this, I didn't get an option, but that's a separate bug. The original request has been implemented.
@Bouzinac Why did you reopen this task which has been merged 2 years ago?
Dec 8 2019
Dec 2 2019
Code isn't live yet and there is a little change needed before it can go live
Dec 1 2019
Nov 28 2019
@jhsoby What's the opinion of langcom?
Nov 23 2019
Nov 22 2019
Also take in account SDOC, so set basic SDOC data
Not sure what the idea behind this task is. So for now it's stalled.
Nov 15 2019
Nov 14 2019
Oct 31 2019
Oct 30 2019
@jhsoby I see an ISO-639-3 code, IETF code and an Ethnologue entry. Is that sufficient or is more needed for LangCom approval?
@Misharim Please provide a correct Wikidata link, this one isn't about a language, but an alphabet.
@jhsoby What is the opinion of the LangCom on this one?
Oct 10 2019
@GerardM Now it's clear for everybody why you're objecting. That's not because you're against the language to be used for monolingual, but you want it to be used in a more broad sense. If you would have explained that earlier (instead of your vague statement) there would be no discussion and plans to move forward. So next time, just explain that you've proposed to have the language used for labels etc. that makes the discussion more clear for others.
Oct 6 2019
Sep 16 2019
Sep 2 2019
Aug 31 2019
Jul 24 2019
Jul 2 2019
Issue occurred again today. Don't know the size of the image as someone else uploaded the image as he was testing the tool
Jun 23 2019
Jun 19 2019
File that results in a 500 error is a 1,61 MB JPG file
File that results in a working upload is a 62,3 kB JPG file
Smaller image went through. I'll stick with smaller images. The image size isn't important for testing the changes. And it's not a live tool.
Yes, this is the correct tool and just tried another upload.