@Gilles the register trial link states, "I understand that I may need to limit use of this experimental feature to some subset of my users because of the limit whereby an experimental feature will be disabled if it is used on more than 0.5% of Chrome page loads". Is this something that we need to add on our side or will chrome automatically handle that?

@Gilles Where is the best place to see our current first input delay score? Is it page speed insights (e.g. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FBarack_Obama)

No longer seeing blue button or message

Not seeing blue button or message appear anymore

I've reviewed failed AC steps:

In T230695#5664564, @alexhollender wrote:

@nray two things I've just noticed:

1. If I open a discussion and then click the back button (without adding a reply), when I return to the main talk page it's scrolled all the way down.
2. There are a lot of flashes when saving a reply and it's pretty disorienting. I don't remember it being like this before.

Screen Recording 2019-11-14 at 1.11.26 PM.mov470 KBDownload

Some frames from the video:

Ticket created at T238385

In T238364#5665106, @Jdlrobson wrote:

Is there a ticket for the table of contents links relating to the html5 section id work as well or do we want to fold those details in here?

It turns out that the fix for T237589 should also fix this ticket which is why there is a gerrit patch associated with this ticket now.

Some really interesting findings here! I had some questions about how these were measured via slack but no need to hold up the sign-off process. Definitely seems like we could do some more lazy loading of ULS to save KB

@Jdlrobson thanks! that helps a lot

We could probably do some more work with the ParserOutput object to see if any content is present. I'm not sure what the best languages would be if content is found that is not a part of a section though

I agree it's confusing as is. I'm not really sure what language change would make it less confusing though without doing more work to parse the html to see if there is content there - All I can think of rn is something like 'No sections found on this page, but click on the "Read as wikipage button" and you could win' which is obviously horrible.

@Edtadros this is now ready to be qa'd.

I'm moving this to needs more work so i can finish the qa steps

In T230695#5637232, @Masumrezarock100 wrote:

A question: How flow talk pages will be rendered in this new version?

Status update: Alex has design review approved latest changes, this will go back in needs code review soon

@Jdlrobson regarding ^^ do you know anything about the active discussions heading concept in the old talkBoard overlay and how feasible it is to add that into the new treatment?

@ovasileva Could we pull this into one of our sprints in the near future so that I could spend some time researching this? It has potential to positively impact the Desktop Improvements project. It's also one of my OKRs :).

Looks like @Jdlrobson is fixing this at https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/mediawiki/skins/MinervaNeue/+/544221/

@ovasileva @Jdlrobson Listed in the AC are these two points:

This is now on beta: https://en.m.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MobileOptions&returnto=Main+Page

In T233611#5574789, @ovasileva wrote:

@nray - would it be okay if I copy some of your findings from the doc to the project page?

looks like the config needed here is $wgMFUseDesktopSpecialWatchlistPage. I think this is ready to be estimated?

@ovasileva I've made the copy read like Alex's wording in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230016#5561195 but want to double check with you before merging. Is "Advanced mode provides easy access to talk pages, history pages, user tools, and other editing tools" okay?