Sat, Oct 17
It is 3 months since the extension was disabled. When will any news be announced?
Wed, Sep 30
Users editing and viewing from mobile website only do not use desktop skins, and therefore do not have a reason to switch away from the default value. Therefore, the percentage for Vector includes many mobile-only users who do not actually use Vector skin.
With the above reason, I suggest excluding mobile-only users (defined as users with only edits tagged with "Mobile web edit" in the past year) next time. Not sure if it is doable though.
Sep 18 2020
Sep 13 2020
- Prototypical discussion page: Not sure what exactly is needed, so I created [[w:ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:井戸端/subj/返信ツールをベータ機能として導入する提案]] and stated that it is for testing purpose at the top of the page. Let me know if you need any changes.
- Configuration: Created [[w:ja:MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix]]. Anything else?
Sep 11 2020
Sep 9 2020
From the description, it is not that clear on how the scripts should be fixed.
Is it simply the following replacements?
.menu -> nav ul .vectorTabs -> .vector-menu-tabs .vectorMenu -> .vector-menu
(By the way, I am not sure how we should fix https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hiroakikawa/_vector.css)
Aug 31 2020
Jun 27 2020
May 20 2020
May 8 2020
Thank you! It looks fine to me too.
May 6 2020
Jan 25 2020
@Dzahn I guess the question then becomes - why were they disabled?
Oct 21 2019
Sep 7 2019
Aug 5 2019
Thanks - the issue in jawiki appears to be fixed now.
May 22 2018
For jawiki, I just posted it at [[:ja:Wikipedia:お知らせ#2018年5月29日のメンテナンス予定]].
Also would like to second to Elitre - in the future, please allow 2 weeks between announcement and action.
Apr 12 2018
Apr 8 2018
Apr 7 2018
Is it too late to add more wikis to this item? Have fixed most high priority lint errors in jawikibooks and there should be fewer than 50 of them now.
Mar 31 2018
@Mvolz: Citoid is now enabled in Japanese Wikipedia. Do we know what is the plan for resolving issues 1 and 3?
Mar 15 2018
@Mvolz: We have not received any objections so far regarding the change in Issue 2, as well as enabling citoid before Issues 1 and 3 are implemented. Nevertheless, we still need to know when we can expect the implementation - is there any timeline currently?
Mar 12 2018
@Mvolz: Thanks! I will bring the suggestion regarding Issue 2 back to the discussion and seek for opinion. We will also confirm whether we could enable citoid first, while waiting for Issues 1 and 3 to be implemented.
@Aklapper: Please find the following.
Jun 19 2017
Hope I am not too late to chip in a reply -
Why is an explanation needed? For average users they probably only want to see them linked, and that's it.
Your argument is that nobody will care enough to make links? This seems to point to the questionable value of having the links at all, if nobody is using them or interested in supporting them.
We don't have unlimited manpower. I am from the Japanese Wikipedia, where the user base is broad but the number of people able to (let alone interested to) support is really thin. Simply being "different and inconsistent" (or other technical reasons) is not a valid argument to cut a working feature and increase the already-too-heavy workload. If it is not like MediaWiki will break down tomorrow, can you please revise this decision to drop magic links?
(Adding one footnote: using a bot increases the number of revisions and uses up some manpower so that doesn't change my argument.)