In T246245#5920570, @iamjessklein wrote:

Here are the three annotated designs. I will update here if there are any tweaks:

In T244874#5918759, @DLynch wrote:

There's a combination of missing and questionably-applicable involved here...

Thank you for laying this out, David. Would I be correct to understand https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/574919 as having the effects listed below? If yes, then +1 to what you suggested in T244874#5918759: "...consider the patch landing and adding in just navigate to leave us in a reasonable state."

Adding Editing Design so @iamjessklein can review ahead of tomorrow's meeting.

In T244498#5878924, @Mayakp.wiki wrote:

Tentative steps decided in 1:1 with @ppelberg today -
V1.1 ---> V2.0 instrumentation: document features needing instrumentation as well as process for instrumenting those on T244498 for Maya to review; once reviewed, we will incorporate into Instrumentation spec
Step 1: document features, ordered by priority of release + metrics associated with each one

In T235593#5916099, @Esanders wrote:

Re: placeholder text saying "Reply to @RockawayBch4vr"

1. Is the '@' necessary?
2. Should we show it for IPs, e.g. "Reply to 192.168.0.1" / "Reply to @192.168.0.1"

My leanings are

1. Probably not, it doesn't necessarily appear anywhere else on the page (except in some wiki-specific mention templates)
2. Probably, it might be helpful to know you clicked on the right reply button?

We appreciate your clear task descriptions (and the patches as well, of course).

We appreciate your work on this, @Akinwale-microsoft

In T244432#5918120, @JTannerWMF wrote:

Talking to @Ryasmeen right now and from her perspective this is done.

Assuming I'm correctly understanding this issue as meaning anytime a talk page contains a URL with an invalid/deprecated URL encoding character(s) [i], no reply links will be shown on the page, two resulting questions:

In T246058#5917507, @iamjessklein wrote:

What should really happen here is that the Reply button should appear as disabled (gray) until theres text in the input field.
This way, it shouldn't be tappable until there's content there.

In T246000#5916447, @matmarex wrote:

We already started working on this in a different task. Thanks for the bug report though (yours was first ;) ).

In T245789#5907667, @matmarex wrote:

We might not be able to handle discussions from 2013 and earlier on ar.wp because of this. I think this is not a big deal, since you probably wouldn't often want to reply to such old posts. But if we wanted to support them, it would be possible, but we'd have to figure out a way to define additional timezone "aliases" or something on each wiki.

In T244683#5910193, @Dyolf77_WMF wrote:

@Whatamidoing-WMF The announcement is done in Arabic, today on the technical village pump in Ar Wiki.

In T244869#5897757, @Whatamidoing-WMF wrote:

https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:PPelberg_(WMF)/sandbox#Deployment_process is okay. I have two suggestions for improvement:

This feedback is helpful – thank you, Sherry. Responses and a resulting question to the points you raised below.

In T242184#5913277, @matmarex wrote:

I merged the subtask back into this task, it turned out to be easy to implement and @DLynch already did that, so I think it'll be easier not to track it separately.

In T244519#5870772, @matmarex wrote:

Draft of the notification/feedback-request page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/New_requirements_for_user_signatures
Next steps:

• @ppelberg @Whatamidoing-WMF (and anyone else, feel free to edit the page): please review and fill in the blanks.

In T244870#5907601, @matmarex wrote:

Personally I'd say that this task is really just about whether the tool is available, which it clearly is, since you've been doing thorough testing for T244432.

In T245574#5907494, @matmarex wrote:

Yes and yes.

Good spot, Bartosz. I'm going to move this to "Nice to have."

This makes sense – thank you for explaining what's going on, Bartosz.

Hmm, @matmarex, do you know why the issue Rummana is describing in the task description might be occurring?

@Ryasmeen – good spot. I don't think it makes sense for a reply link to appear within an image caption, despite that caption being signed (as it seems to be).

@matmarex can you confirm the following are true?

• Currently, the discarded reply "traces" are only visible to the person who drafted the comment
• Currently, the discarded reply "traces" disappear once the the person who drafted the comment refreshes the page

In T245571#5902094, @Ryasmeen wrote:

In T245571#5901939, @JTannerWMF wrote:

Hey @Ryasmeen, @ppelberg and I are on a call now trying to reproduce and we aren't able to. Can you check if you're still running into this issue? Can you also add to the ticket which browser you used when this error occurred?

...So maybe try to use an account that never enabled DiscussionTools on those wiki before.