These were helpful to see – thank you for posting these, @Ryasmeen + @matmarex:

In T223302#5259441, @mpopov wrote:

Okay, here are the daily user counts, VE session counts, sessions/user rates, and edit completion (success) rates:

Key takeaways from the analysis:

• No clear change in sessions/user
  • The average number of sessions per user was 1.94 in the control group and 1.948 in the treatment group; this change was not statistically significant
  • We're good to keep section editing on without worrying that it may negatively impact this metric
• Clear improvement in completion rate
  • There was statistically significant (p-value = 0.034) improvement of 0.98% (in probability of completion) on average
    • For example: on Korean Wikipedia the probability that a started mobile VE session would would end in an edit goes from 36.75% to 37.73% when section editing is enabled
    • The greatest impact is estimated to be on Catalan Wikipedia, where the improvement is 1.042% (from 45.36% in controls to 46.41% in treatment)
    • Refer to https://analytics.wikimedia.org/datasets/editing-reports/section-editing-experiment.html#Per-wiki-improvements for additional examples
  • This roughly translates to 1 more completed VE edit for every 100 started if section editing is enabled than if it's not; or, viewed in another way, 1 fewer abandoned VE edit for every 100 started
    
    @ppelberg: My analysis of the data suggests that we should do a full rollout of section editing on mobile VE :D

In T223302#5262679, @iamjessklein wrote:

My analysis of the data suggests that we should do a full rollout of section editing on mobile VE :D

This is great news. Thanks for the analysis @mpopov

In T221311#5260114, @Ryasmeen wrote:

In T221311#5259641, @Esanders wrote:

In T221311#5258166, @ppelberg wrote:

== Edit Card cut off ==
@Ryasmeen, during our initial testing, there was an instance where parts of the Edit Card were cut off. See how the link label, "Elizabeth f. Bennet", runs the "Change label" text off-screen in Screenshot A below?

Yeah, assuming we are talking about T199617, that is indeed fixed.

Great.

However, I am noticing one thing that looks slightly odd to me. When I am tapping on a link, I see the keyboard opens momentarily and slides down and then Edit card appears. Wondering what the correct behavior should be.

@Ryasmeen, are you able to post a video of the keyboard showing/opening momentarily upon tapping a link? I have not yet been able to reproduce this behavior using an iPhone XS + Safari.

In T225568#5259765, @Amire80 wrote:

What do you mean by "recycling"? Are you planning to use the same strings in two places?

Ah, I can see how "recycling" was ambiguous. Sorry for any confusion.

Considering we are not making any translations for v1.0. I am associating this ticket with v2.0 (T225725), which will include new messages that will likely require translations.

In T225568#5251625, @matmarex wrote:

Translations have been merged into the code

Great.

Two new messages have been added in https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/VisualEditor/VisualEditor/+/514510 ("Add a link" and "Edit link"), I assume that's all that's needed.

I have not yet been able to reproduce this, but I wanted you to be aware of this potential issue.

• We will be doing pre-deployment QA on Edit Cards v1.0. See: T221311
  • As such, I am removing "...confirm whether parts of Edit Card are still being cutoff. See "Elizabeth Bennet" screenshot in T221309#5250100" as blocking from this task's description.

For v1.0 we will be shipping the version that is currently deployed to the prototype server (pictured below). We will revisit the changes discussed in this ticket as part of the changes we plan to make in v2.0: T225725

I think what we have below is great for our v1.0, save for two copy changes to the editable fields:

• Change "Label" to "Display text"
• Change "Link" to "Link target"

In T223339#5255612, @kzimmerman wrote:

As I understand it, the most urgent need is for Desktop edit completion rate segmented by whether VE is default or not, in addition to editing interface and user experience.

Thank you for explaining @Esanders + @iamjessklein...all that you described in T225629#5256058 and T225629#5256664 sounds good to me.

In T225629#5254487, @iamjessklein wrote:

thoughts/feedback are welcome either here or drawn on the freehand