Wed, Oct 16
Tue, Oct 15
Some other "Selection Criteria" to consider as inspired by Communication networks do not explain the growth or survival of early-stage peer production projects:
Mon, Oct 14
Fri, Oct 11
Thu, Oct 10
Updated the task description. Made the following change to the retention metric
Wed, Oct 9
Below are notes from the conversation @MNeisler and I had this morning...
@Mayakp.wiki, this patch (see below) should be ready for QA as soon as tomorrow.
@Esanders, how'd you arrive at not providing contributors any feedback  about their attempted paste?
@MNeisler, copying over a few thoughts from conversations we've had before...
- "5. Productive contributions to article pages": any edits to Wikipedia articles that are not reverted.
- Is ORES goodfaith a better predictor of "productive contributions" than non-reverted edits?
Tue, Oct 8
Documenting next steps from @iamjessklein's and my meeting today:
Mon, Oct 7
I am drafting this spec in our Talk Pages/Planning document. Everyone should have access to comment on this document.
Adding some additional questions/thoughts to the ones posted in T234046#5539981:
Sat, Oct 5
Fri, Oct 4
Thu, Oct 3
Got it. Thank you for demonstrating this and for updating the task description accordingly, David.
Thank you, Megan. A couple quick comments in-line, below...
This comment pulls together the questions that emerged on this ticket, in various meetings and most recently, our discussion around what our next steps should be around the VE as default A/B test that took place in this task: T234277.
Great work, @matmarex. Documenting a question that came up during today's planning meeting...
Wed, Oct 2
I think we should re-run the test with no modifications to the design of the test, save for any changes @MNeisler deems to be necessary as a result of answering the "Resulting questions" below.
Our objectives and key results for this project have been defined as follows: