Tyler CC'd for approval

• mwversion: 1.39.0-wmf.17
• reqId: 4a211fc3-4ddc-4b82-9149-407350396094
• Find reqId in Logstash

After chatting with individual RelEngers, I wanted to add some clarification here.

Talked to @LSobanski and he asked for some clarification on the steps we need root help with.

• access request (or expansion) has sign off of group approver indicated by the approval field in data.yaml

In T305191#8010455, @TheresNoTime wrote:

@thcipriani I mentioned this on IRC, but just logging here too 🙂 @ArielGlenn suggested that in the next training session it would be good for me to do a deploy and be walked through it live — I think that's a great idea, but am I right in thinking I'd need to be added to the deployment group prior? If so, should I request that here or back in T302231: Requesting access to deployment for TheresNoTime?

Declining for WMF Inspiration week.

Thanks for the report!

In T309375#7963808, @Dzahn wrote:

checked off boxes (L3 signed, NDA, has existing shell access, etc).

Will need approval from group approver (Tyler).

1.39.0-wmf.15 code stuff

In T310532#8004202, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

Is this just the UBN-ness of the back-ported fixes to AbuseFilter for T212129: Move MainStash out of Redis to a simpler multi-dc aware solution?

No, because it's still apparent in prod after that was back-ported. Never mind.

In case it's helpful here, here's a list of everything that went live during that spike: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_1.39/wmf.15/Changelog

In T308068#7995056, @JMeybohm wrote:

I see mcrouter get+gets increased significantly since the rollout to group2: https://grafana-rw.wikimedia.org/d/RIA1lzDZk/application-servers-red-dashboard?orgId=1&from=1654530600000&to=1654876200000&viewPanel=26
Is that something that is expected? (cc @Krinkle )

Making UBN! as a train blocker

Note: I was pairing with @brennen on this—we didn't --force push, we ran: git push origin +HEAD:refs/heads/wmf/stable

This one seems straightforward enough: it matches @WMDE-leszek's permissions in Gerrit, and may be covered by https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Privilege_policy#Expedited_process_for_trusted_organisations, so I went ahead and did it.

In T308067#7975902, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

I’m not sure if T309770: TimedText namespace appearing on all Wikimedia wiki is a train blocker, but looking at the code, it may cause TimedText namespace appearing on all WMF wikis (in contrast to the former four production and three test wikis), and once a namespace appeared, people may start using it, making removal difficult. I’ll be offline for a few hours now, so I’ll let you decide.

In T305191#7977040, @TheresNoTime wrote:

In T305191#7976993, @thcipriani wrote:

hiya @TheresNoTime — do you have an invite to the training you were hoping to attend (either UTC early or UTC late)?

@thcipriani I do not have an invite for the UTC early training slot, could you invite me please? :-) preferably on my Wikimedia email if you don't mind!

hiya @TheresNoTime — do you have an invite to the training you were hoping to attend (either UTC early or UTC late)?

1. Training completed!

In T308506#7973558, @Seddon wrote:

@thcipriani & @Jdlrobson that logstash link appears broken as its not showing me any events?