Change Details

- Location: #wikimedia-office IRC channel - [Meeting type](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Good_meetings#Taxonomy): TBD - Time: Weekly, Wednesday 21:00 UTC (2pm [PDT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America/Los_Angeles), 23:00 [CEST](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_European_Summer_Time)) - This time is the standard as of this writing (in March 2016), but may change as we make adjustments to accommodate daylight savings/summer time adjustments for the participants. By default, we intend for this meeting to be held Wednesday 2pm [San Francisco time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America/Los_Angeles). - Agenda: - TBD (for discussion in comments) | **[Architecture meetings](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings) ** | |-----------------| | 13:00 PT ArchCom Planning Meetings | [upcoming](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/DlzGwrbxMLu9/) | [all since 2016-03-30](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/M4fMy2PZOBQQ/) | | **14:00 PT ArchCom-RFC Meetings** | **[upcoming](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/ShzbHT6BPGCE/)** | **[all since 2015-09-09](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/XJjy54s3PEFf/)**

- Location: #wikimedia-office IRC channel - [Meeting type](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Good_meetings#Taxonomy): Consensus for final comment (on the three options). - Time: Weekly, Wednesday 21:00 UTC (2pm [PDT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America/Los_Angeles), 23:00 [CEST](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_European_Summer_Time)) - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Content_model_storage Agenda: decide how to proceed regarding the storage of content model an format in the database. A proposal for this was approved a year ago, but never implemented, possibly because the solution overlaps with planned work for supporting multi-content-revisions. Three options are up for discussion: 1. Implement {{T105652}} as originally approved a year ago, with new columns in the page, revision, and archive tables. 2. Implement a modified version with one extra table but now new columns, as proposed in <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:T92zmz723prcz2pu>, to also cater to the needs of multi content revisions. 3. take a step back and reconsider. Should we agree on (1) or (2), the expectation is that the proposal will be put on "last call", and then be implemented very soon.

- Location: #wikimedia-office IRC channel - [Meeting type](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Good_meetings#Taxonomy): TBDConsensus for final comment (on the three options). - Time: Weekly, Wednesday 21:00 UTC (2pm [PDT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America/Los_Angeles), 23:00 [CEST](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_European_Summer_Time)) - This time is the standard as of this writing (in March 2016), but may change as we make adjustments to accommodate daylight savings/summer time adjustments for the participants. By default,- https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Content_model_storage Agenda: decide how to proceed regarding the storage of content model an format in the database. we intendA proposal for this meeting to be held Wednesday 2pm [San Francisco time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America/Los_Angeles). was approved a year ago, - Agenda: - TBD (for discussion in comments) | **[Architecture meetings](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings) ** | |-----------------|but never implemented, possibly because the solution overlaps with planned work for supporting multi-content-revisions. Three options are up for discussion: | 13:00 PT ArchCom Planning Meetings | [upcoming](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/DlzGwrbxMLu9/) | [all since 2016-03-30](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/M4fMy2PZOBQQ/) |1. Implement {{T105652}} as originally approved a year ago, with new columns in the page, revision, and archive tables. | **14:00 PT ArchCom-RFC Meetings** | **[upcoming](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/ShzbHT6BPGCE/)** | **[all since 2015-09-09](https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/calendar/query/XJjy54s3PEFf/)**2. Implement a modified version with one extra table but now new columns, as proposed in <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:T92zmz723prcz2pu>, to also cater to the needs of multi content revisions. 3. take a step back and reconsider. Should we agree on (1) or (2), the expectation is that the proposal will be put on "last call", and then be implemented very soon.