Change Details

We should make sure that there's nothing fishy or funny going on with data as we aggregate it into the hourly pageviews table. We can vet it approximately using sampling on the raw data and we can spot-check vet it for a few hours doing select count(*) from wmf.webrequest * Outcome of the task: Report including top articles on various wikis, project counts, with comparison with existing legacy data.

Documentation for the data: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Data/Pageview_hourly We should make sure that there's nothing fishy or funny going on with data as we aggregate it into the hourly pageviews table. We can vet it approximately using sampling on the raw data and we can spot-check vet it for a few hours doing select count(*) from wmf.webrequest * Outcome of the task: Report including top articles on various wikis, project counts, with comparison with existing legacy data.

Documentation for the data: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Data/Pageview_hourly We should make sure that there's nothing fishy or funny going on with data as we aggregate it into the hourly pageviews table. We can vet it approximately using sampling on the raw data and we can spot-check vet it for a few hours doing select count(*) from wmf.webrequest * Outcome of the task: Report including top articles on various wikis, project counts, with comparison with existing legacy data.