**(1)** The fields correctly intercept invalid value such as `0.002` - the warning appears. But the suggested values (from the value selector at the end of the field) include negative values.
{F43705749}
Another example of handling numbers in the fields - large numbers are accepted and converted to scientific notation:
{F43709257}
**(4)** **Mentorship** section in Special:EditGrowthConfig has information that is not present on Special:CommunityConfiguration/Mentorship
|{F43708249}| {F55035700}
✅ ** DONE (2)** Do we need single quotes around Mentorship? - the single quotes are removed as part of T361933- Special:EditGrowthConfig has "Know more about how mentorship works" link to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth/FAQ#Mentorship
{F43707930}- probably would be good to have links to "Special:EnrollasMentor" and "Special:ClaimMentee"
**(3) ** `x` (in the above screenshot) I didn't find the presence of this control in [[ https://www.figma.com/file/bT1O4TChNV5TpwF5JHgKAK/Community-Configuration-2.0?type=design&node-id=1581-6799&mode=design&t=gM1N7UEC424e6TLB-0 | figma design]]5) ** The fields occupy the whole page width (Special:EditGrowthConfig limits the fields length).
**(6)** @Tacsipacsi comment https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T354463#9674654
**(4)** **Mentorship** section in Special:EditGrowthConfig has information that is not present on Special:CommunityConfiguration/Mentorship>>! In T354463#9671719, @Etonkovidova wrote:
|{F43708249}| {F43708402}> {F43702086}
I noticed two differences that I’m not sure if they are intentional:
* The //(optional)// text is bold. In both designs in the description, it has a normal weight.
What Special:EditGrowthConfig ha* The summary box is huge. In one design, it’s a two-line textbox, in the other one, it’s a one-line input; in the implementation, it’s eight lines tall. This gives the impression that the edit summary can be however long I want it to be (and indeed, nothing on the frontend prevents me from writing an over 1000 characters long summary, even though the backend (MW core) caps the summary at 500 characters).
> Two minor questions:
- short explanation of Mentors roles> - on submitting edits in VE, a suggestion,there is a footer with legal clause with links to licensees and to the Terms of Use. anDo we need a link to more information
- "Are mentorship features enabled?" is the first questionthe Terms of Use in the Edit Summary too?
Also, should we have **"Send us your feedback"** on Special:CommunityConfiguration/Mentorship?
**(5) ** The fields occupy the whole page width (Special:EditGrowthConfig limits the fields length)> - the placement of the Reminder is the same as for the footer for saving edits which might confuse those users who used to see different footer.
**(6)** @Tacsipacsi comment https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T354463#9674654What if both messages were displayed below each other, with the Reminder being above and maybe on a grey background (like the checkboxes in VE)? Especially the color difference would stress that this is not just the usual stuff.
**(7)** from https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T357710#9733651
- The list of suggestions displays the titles in black, not in blue (as links) as they are displayed in produciton:
|`eswiki beta`| production
|---|---
|{F48184804}|{F48185060}
- the text field doesn't have the input text placeholder
- the invalid input (no matching pages) has no indication that it's invalid
|`eswiki beta`| production
|---|---
|{F48185431} {F48185886} |{F48185663} {F48185801}
(8) The first field on Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits -** Infobox templates** in its current implementation doesn't have links
- to Special:NewcomerTasksInfo
**//Additi- to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Growth/Personal Notes: //**ized_first_day/Structured_tasks/Add_an_image
Figma design has such links.
|[[ https://es.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Especial:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits | eswiki beta ]]| [[ https://www.figma.com/file/bT1O4TChNV5TpwF5JHgKAK/Community-Configuration-2.0?type=design&node-id=1229-33012&mode=design | figma design ]]| [[ https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Especial:EditGrowthConfig&uselang=en| eswiki wmf.1]]
|---|---|---
|{F48138877|{F55036490}|{F48141728} | {F48139013}
As it's implemented now(9) Should "Give feedback" option be on `eswiki betaevery module page?
(1) The text is not present on a page: "Some types of suggested edits are surfaced through ..."
(2) The text "These templates are needed for the** image suggestions **newcomer task feature{F55036549}
(10) and (11) are from this comment - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T360471#9831541
(10)**Add a link** section**
Currently in production two add link tasks (structured and un-structured types) have the same title: **Add links between articles**. [[ https://www.figma.com/design/bT1O4TChNV5TpwF5JHgKAK/Community-Configuration-2.0?node-id=2082-18032&t=aCfih0XaRhu6qTuP-0 | The figma design ]] also uses the same title for both type of tasks (to differentiate them two icons are used). On [[ https://es.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Especial:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits | Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits ]] two different titles are used - **Add links between articles** and **Add a link** - was it documented somewhere that there would be two different titles?
The robot icon was used to differentiate between structured (algorithm-suggested) tasks and others - in betalabs the robot icon was not present.
(11) there are two fields added to the end of [[ https://es.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Especial:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits | Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits ]] page - **Weight of underlinked articles** and **Minimum required link score**. Articles containing these templates will not be listed as image suggestion tasks." doesn't have a link for ** image suggestions **.Those fields are not present on [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EditGrowthConfig | Special:EditGrowthConfig]] or in [[ https://www.figma.com/design/bT1O4TChNV5TpwF5JHgKAK/Community-Configuration-2.0?node-id=2082-18032&t=aCfih0XaRhu6qTuP-0 | the figma design ]]. Such fields might require some technical knowledge and an additional understanding of a suggested link algorithm - is it expected from admin users?
=== DONE ===
✅ ** DONE (2)** Do we need single quotes around Mentorship? - the single quotes are removed as part of T361933
{F43707930}
✅ ** DONE (3) ** `x` (in the above screenshot) I didn't find the presence of this control in [[ https://www.figma.com/file/bT1O4TChNV5TpwF5JHgKAK/Community-Configuration-2.0?type=design&node-id=1581-6799&mode=design&t=gM1N7UEC424e6TLB-0 | figma design]]