Change Details

**Research questions:** 1. Does positioning all mobile context items at the bottom of the screen and making them larger cause contributors to engage with them more often? -- Read: do contributors tap edit “✎” more often? 2. Do "Edit cards" cause more contributors to engage with adding/modifying links and citations? -- Asked another way: "What percentage of contributors who are shown the edit card (revised) or context item (existing) end up engaging with it?" How deep do contributors go into the workflows of adding/modifying links and citations? 3. Do "Edit cards" increase the percentage of people who successfully add/modify links and citations? 4. Do “Edit cards” and the revisions to their subsequent workflows cause a higher percentage of contributors to have success adding/modifying links and citations? -- What % of contributors who start to add/modify a link and citation are successful in doing so? How do these proportions compare across the existing and revised workflows? 5. Do "Edit cards" cause contributors to engage with adding/modifying links more frequently? 6. Do “Edit cards” cause more people to save their edits (read: edit completion rate)? -- What % of edit sessions, in which contributors successfully add/modify a link, result in them attempting to save their edits?" How do the revised and end existing flows compare in this way?

**Research questions:** 1. Does positioning existing mobile context items at the bottom of the screen and making them larger cause contributors to engage with them more often? -- Read: do contributors tap edit more often? 2. Do "Edit cards" cause more contributors to engage with adding/modifying links and citations? -- Asked another way: "What percentage of contributors who are shown the edit card (revised) or context item (existing) end up engaging with it?" How deep do contributors go into the workflows of adding/modifying links and citations? 3. Do “Edit cards” and the revisions to their subsequent workflows cause a higher percentage of contributors to have success adding/modifying links and citations? -- What % of contributors who start to add/modify a link and citation are successful in doing so? How do these proportions compare across the existing and revised workflows? 4. Do "Edit cards" cause contributors to engage with adding/modifying links more frequently? 5. Do “Edit cards” cause more people to save their edits (read: edit completion rate)? -- What % of edit sessions, in which contributors successfully add/modify a link, result in them attempting to save their edits?" How do the revised and end existing flows compare in this way?

**Research questions:** 1. Does positioning allexisting mobile context items at the bottom of the screen and making them larger cause contributors to engage with them more often? -- Read: do contributors tap edit “✎” more often? 2. Do "Edit cards" cause more contributors to engage with adding/modifying links and citations? -- Asked another way: "What percentage of contributors who are shown the edit card (revised) or context item (existing) end up engaging with it?" How deep do contributors go into the workflows of adding/modifying links and citations? 3. Do "Edit cards" increase the percentage of people who successfully add/modify links and citations? 4 3. Do “Edit cards” and the revisions to their subsequent workflows cause a higher percentage of contributors to have success adding/modifying links and citations? -- What % of contributors who start to add/modify a link and citation are successful in doing so? How do these proportions compare across the existing and revised workflows? 54. Do "Edit cards" cause contributors to engage with adding/modifying links more frequently? 65. Do “Edit cards” cause more people to save their edits (read: edit completion rate)? -- What % of edit sessions, in which contributors successfully add/modify a link, result in them attempting to save their edits?" How do the revised and end existing flows compare in this way?