Change Details

Include an ORES good-faith score for every edit in the ERI feed (established in T143743). In addition, to make ORES scores more readily understandable, include a simplified system of flags to indicate discrete levels within the continuum of scores, as defined in T142785. The thresholds for the various discrete levels should be configurable, and should be configurable on a per-wiki basis. (It's likely we'll employ a more neutral way to describe this property than “Damaging” —E.g., “Possible Error”, “Needs Review”, etc.—but that should be addressed in the design process.)

Include an ORES good-faith score for every edit in the ERI feed (established in T143743). In addition, to make ORES scores more readily understandable, include a simplified system of flags to indicate discrete levels within the continuum of scores, as defined in T142785. The thresholds for the various discrete levels should be configurable, and should be configurable on a per-wiki basis. (It's likely we'll employ a more neutral way to describe this property than “Damaging” —E.g., “Possible Error”, “Needs Review”, etc.—but that should be addressed in the design process.) CLOSING THIS AS IT IS A DUPLICATE OF T149734

Include an ORES good-faith score for every edit in the ERI feed (established in T143743). In addition, to make ORES scores more readily understandable, include a simplified system of flags to indicate discrete levels within the continuum of scores, as defined in T142785. The thresholds for the various discrete levels should be configurable, and should be configurable on a per-wiki basis. (It's likely we'll employ a more neutral way to describe this property than “Damaging” —E.g., “Possible Error”, “Needs Review”, etc.—but that should be addressed in the design process.) CLOSING THIS AS IT IS A DUPLICATE OF T149734