Change Details

I believe gadget developers would benefit from having autogenerated documentation, using jsDuck, as we currently have for MediaWiki code. See also: * http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-January/065751.html * http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-July/070439.html -------------------------- **Version**: unspecified **Severity**: enhancement **See Also**: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69445 https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37230

I believe gadget developers would benefit from having autogenerated documentation, using jsDuck, as we currently have for MediaWiki code. See also: * http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-January/065751.html * http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-July/070439.html **See Also**: * {T71445} * {T39230}

I believe gadget developers would benefit from having autogenerated documentation, using jsDuck, as we currently have for MediaWiki code. See also: * http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-January/065751.html * http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2013-July/070439.html -------------------------- **Version**: unspecified **Severity**: enhancement **See Also**: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69445* {T71445} https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37230* {T39230}