Change Details

T341308, and more immediately, T347531 will make it feasible for showing people multiple Edit Checks within a single edit. This task represents the work of arriving at a user experience, and the corresponding design pattern(s)/paradigm(s), capable of scaling to accommodate Edit Check presenting people with multiple checks within a single editing sessions Where "multiple" in the scope of this ticket could mean: 1. A single Edit Check type (e.g. [editcheck-reference-activated](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check/Tags)) that is relevant to >1 places within the article someone is editing. 2) ≥2 Edit Check types relevant to a single place within the article someone is editing. 3) Multiple Edit Check types relevant to multipole places within the article someone is editing. === Story As someone who is unaware of Wikipedia's content policies to the extent that the software can assume I'm likely to publish an edit that will "defy" them [i], I'd value being made aware of this information in an actionable way within a moment that I'm likely to be motivated/open to considering it so that I can publish change(s) **A)** I stand by and that **B)** are likely to remain on the wiki. === Requirements //Note: the user experience this ticket produces ought to be capable of scaling to a variety of Edit Checks and edit suggestions.// === Learning objectives This ticket is scoped with the goal of helping us to arrive at initial answers to the following questions: - [ ] 1. When and how is the feedback stored if/when people dismiss it? - [ ] 2. When and how are multiple peoples of feedback stored? --- i. There's probably a more descriptive word than "defy"

T341308, and more immediately, T347531 will make it feasible for showing people multiple Edit Checks within a single edit. This task represents the work of arriving at a user experience, and the corresponding design pattern(s)/paradigm(s), capable of scaling to accommodate Edit Check presenting people with multiple checks within a single editing session. Where "multiple" in the scope of this ticket could mean: 1. A single Edit Check type (e.g. [editcheck-reference-activated](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check/Tags)) that is relevant to >1 places within the article someone is editing. 2) ≥2 Edit Check types relevant to a single place within the article someone is editing. 3) Multiple Edit Check types relevant to multipole places within the article someone is editing. === Story **As someone** who is unaware of Wikipedia's content policies to the extent that the software can assume I'm likely to publish an edit that will "defy" them [i], **I'd value** being made aware of this information in an actionable way within a moment that I'm likely to be motivated/open to considering it **so that** I can publish change(s) **A)** I stand by and that **B)** are likely to remain on the wiki. === Requirements //Note: the user experience this ticket produces ought to be capable of scaling to a variety of Edit Checks and edit suggestions.// === Learning objectives This ticket is scoped with the goal of helping us to arrive at initial answers to the following questions: - [ ] 1. When and how is the feedback stored if/when people dismiss it? - [ ] 2. When and how are multiple peoples of feedback stored? --- i. There's probably a more descriptive word than "defy"

T341308, and more immediately, T347531 will make it feasible for showing people multiple Edit Checks within a single edit. This task represents the work of arriving at a user experience, and the corresponding design pattern(s)/paradigm(s), capable of scaling to accommodate Edit Check presenting people with multiple checks within a single editing sessions. Where "multiple" in the scope of this ticket could mean: 1. A single Edit Check type (e.g. [editcheck-reference-activated](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check/Tags)) that is relevant to >1 places within the article someone is editing. 2) ≥2 Edit Check types relevant to a single place within the article someone is editing. 3) Multiple Edit Check types relevant to multipole places within the article someone is editing. === Story **As someone** who is unaware of Wikipedia's content policies to the extent that the software can assume I'm likely to publish an edit that will "defy" them [i], **I'd value** being made aware of this information in an actionable way within a moment that I'm likely to be motivated/open to considering it **so that** I can publish change(s) **A)** I stand by and that **B)** are likely to remain on the wiki. === Requirements //Note: the user experience this ticket produces ought to be capable of scaling to a variety of Edit Checks and edit suggestions.// === Learning objectives This ticket is scoped with the goal of helping us to arrive at initial answers to the following questions: - [ ] 1. When and how is the feedback stored if/when people dismiss it? - [ ] 2. When and how are multiple peoples of feedback stored? --- i. There's probably a more descriptive word than "defy"