Change Details

It's possible that we would be able to find indicators that a machine revscore is going to cause humans to revolt in disagreement. We might train a learning machine to flag these scores and prioritize them for human review...

Bold-Revert-Discuss is an essay about good wiki practices. Not all reverts need discussion, but many do. Which reverts tend to get discussion? It's possible that we would be able to find indicators that curation action (like a revert for damage) is going to cause substantial disagreement? We might train a learning machine to flag these scores and prioritize them for human (or maybe human-who-likes-to-talk-to-other-humans) review.

It's possible that we would be able to find indicators that a machine revscore is going to cause humans to revolt in disagreementBold-Revert-Discuss is an essay about good wiki practices. Not all reverts need discussion, but many do. Which reverts tend to get discussion? It's possible that we would be able to find indicators that curation action (like a revert for damage) is going to cause substantial disagreement? We might train a learning machine to flag these scores and prioritize them for human (or maybe human-who-likes-to-talk-to-other-humans) review...