Change Details

User Story: “As a PM, I want us to be able to make disambiguation pages distinguishable in realtime for the reuser" Job Story: “When the reuser is indexing new pages or creating a graph of existing new pages and want to use disambiguation pages to differentiate two or more articles that have the same name" Example: Jaguar (the car, the animal) **Acceptance criteria** # Document that explains how to use the category **ToDo** - [ ] Write a document that explains how to use the category - [] share document ===== Test Strategy ===== How I'm planning to test this? Can I do integration testing or this should be tested manually? Where this testing should be happening (what environment, local or dev)? What this can influence (what can be broken by this feature)? **Checklist for testing** - [ ] check if this thing is active - [ ] check if another thing is active ===== Things to consider: ===== * Will this work need new alarms/monitoring added. * Do we need to update any documentation (playbook or public documentation for this work) * etc. ===== Description (optional) ===== If possible add information on how this story/epic will contribute to the bigger picture or how it relates to the milestones being aimed for. This is a direct customer request. Because we already ingest disambiguation pages in the article namespace, we should tag them as such as they are created or revised. Currently, this is assumed to be low hanging fruit. Is this correct?

As a PM, I want us to be able to make disambiguation pages distinguishable in realtime for the reuser. When the reuser is indexing new pages or creating a graph of existing new pages and want to use disambiguation pages to differentiate two or more articles that have the same name. Example: Jaguar (the car, the animal). 51 WP language editions have an equivalent to [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5324224#sitelinks-wikipedia | “wikipedia redirects” category ]] and 204 Wikipedias have a [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1982926#sitelinks-wikipedia | “disambiguation pages” ]] category equivalent, making this a quite suitable and reliable way of making this very visible. To Do: - [ ] Write a document that explains how to use the category - [ ] Share document

User Story: “As a PM, I want us to be able to make disambiguation pages distinguishable in realtime for the reuser" Job Story: “When the reuser is indexing new pages or creating a graph of existing new pages and want to use disambiguation pages to differentiate two or more articles that have the same name" Example: Jaguar (the carAs a PM, the animal) **Acceptance criteria** # Document that explains how to useI want us to be able to make disambiguation pages distinguishable in realtime for the categoryreuser. **ToDo** - [ ] Write a document that explains how to use the category - [] share document ===== Test Strategy ===== How I'm planning to test this? Can I do integration testing or this should be tested manually? Where this testing should be happening (what environment,When the reuser is indexing new pages or creating a graph of existing new pages and want to use disambiguation pages to differentiate two or more articles that have the same name. local or dev)?Example: Jaguar (the car, What this can influence (what can be broken by this feature)?the animal). **Checklist for testing** - [ ] check if this thing is active - [ ] check if another thing is active51 WP language editions have an equivalent to [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5324224#sitelinks-wikipedia | “wikipedia redirects” category ]] and 204 Wikipedias have a [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1982926#sitelinks-wikipedia | “disambiguation pages” ]] category equivalent, making this a quite suitable and reliable way of making this very visible. ===== Things to consider: ===== * Will this work need new alarms/monitoring added. * Do we need to update any documentation (playbook or public documentation for this work) * etc. ===== Description (optional) =====To Do: - [ ] Write a document that explains how to use the category If possible add information on how this story/epic will contribute to the bigger picture or how it relates to the milestones being aimed for.- [ ] Share document This is a direct customer request. Because we already ingest disambiguation pages in the article namespace, we should tag them as such as they are created or revised. Currently, this is assumed to be low hanging fruit. Is this correct?