Change Details

This task is about inspecting a sample of Reply Tool diffs to ensure there are no instances of content corruption. === Background. [622176](https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176) will, ideally, resolve "Issue 2" described in the task description of T259855. Because "Issue 2" cannot be easily reproduced in a testing environment, it will be difficult for us to know the extent to which this issue persists prior to the patch intended to resolve it [i] being deployed. As such, once the patch [i] is deployed, we will inspect a sample of Reply Tool diffs to ensure there are no instances of content corruption [ii] using the run the script @matmarex wrote and shared in T260393#6384098 === Timing This task should be worked on the week of 31-August, assuming https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176 reaches all wikis on 27-August. === Done - [ ] Reply Tool diffs are inspected using the script @matmarex wrote and shared in T260393#6384098 - [ ] Any instances of Reply Tool edits causing changes //other than// content being added to the page are documented on this ticket --- i. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176 ii. These are two examples of the kind of content corruption we would expect to see more of if the "Issue 2" is NOT resolved: -- https://w.wiki/aQ$ -- https://w.wiki/aR2

This task is about inspecting a sample of Reply Tool diffs to ensure there are no instances of content corruption. === Background. [622176](https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176) will, ideally, resolve "Issue 2" described in the task description of T259855. Because "Issue 2" cannot be easily reproduced in a testing environment, it will be difficult for us to know the extent to which this issue persists prior to the patch intended to resolve it [i] being deployed. As such, once the patch [i] is deployed, we will inspect a sample of Reply Tool diffs to ensure there are no instances of content corruption [ii] using the run the script @matmarex wrote and shared in T260393#6384098 === Timing This task should be worked on **after** 2-September, assuming T252558 is deployed on 2-September as we plan for it to be. [iii] === Done - [ ] Reply Tool diffs are inspected using the script @matmarex wrote and shared in T260393#6384098 - [ ] Any instances of Reply Tool edits causing changes //other than// content being added to the page are documented on this ticket --- i. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176 ii. These are two examples of the kind of content corruption we would expect to see more of if the "Issue 2" is NOT resolved: -- https://w.wiki/aQ$ -- https://w.wiki/aR2 iii. T252558#6428684

This task is about inspecting a sample of Reply Tool diffs to ensure there are no instances of content corruption. === Background. [622176](https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176) will, ideally, resolve "Issue 2" described in the task description of T259855. Because "Issue 2" cannot be easily reproduced in a testing environment, it will be difficult for us to know the extent to which this issue persists prior to the patch intended to resolve it [i] being deployed. As such, once the patch [i] is deployed, we will inspect a sample of Reply Tool diffs to ensure there are no instances of content corruption [ii] using the run the script @matmarex wrote and shared in T260393#6384098 === Timing This task should be worked on the week of 31-August**after** 2-September, assuming https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176 reaches all wikis on 27-August.T252558 is deployed on 2-September as we plan for it to be. [iii] === Done - [ ] Reply Tool diffs are inspected using the script @matmarex wrote and shared in T260393#6384098 - [ ] Any instances of Reply Tool edits causing changes //other than// content being added to the page are documented on this ticket --- i. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/622176 ii. These are two examples of the kind of content corruption we would expect to see more of if the "Issue 2" is NOT resolved: -- https://w.wiki/aQ$ -- https://w.wiki/aR2 iii. T252558#6428684