Change Details

Identify specific parenthetical elements to exclude from Hovercards, e.g. `class="IPA"` for pronunciation templates, to let Hovercards be more specific in its content filtering. This is a followup from the decision to remove all parenthetical content - which was originally done because a few types of content can often take up a lot of characters in the first sentence, which made the hovercard/extract a lot less useful. Those types are: * pronunciation - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany - At enwiki the template-family already contains `class="IPA"` * etymology - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology - no standard class, in enwiki * birth/death dates & location - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shakespeare - no standard class, in enwiki * (other?) This aspect has been discussed in a few topics, such as: * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Scdhcjurfi3fe96o * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:S6q53exrf5ir908w * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:S789qh0m321280v5 * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Rvrf5mi32feehqf3 and originally removed in {T67138} (and followup in {T69225}). We'd like to do it more precisely/judiciously, but without negatively affecting other re-users of extracts... - so we can't just re-use the `class="noexcerpt"` (e.g. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:IPAc-en |template:IPAc-en ]]) or `class="nopopups"` (e.g. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:H:IPA | template:H:IPA]]) without deeply understanding what those classes already cover. --- NOTE: Currently, `renderer.article` requests TextExtracts for plaintext excerpts and removes //everything// within brackets. Can anyone help us map out the existing uses of `class="noexcerpt"` and `class="nopopups"` ? Or suggest other ideas?

Identify specific parenthetical elements to exclude from Hovercards, e.g. `class="IPA"` for pronunciation templates, to let Hovercards be more specific in its content filtering. This is a followup from the decision to remove all parenthetical content - which was originally done because a few types of content can often take up a lot of characters in the first sentence, which made the hovercard/extract a lot less useful. Those types are: * pronunciation - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany - At enwiki the template-family already contains `class="IPA"` * etymology - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology - no standard class, in enwiki * birth/death dates & location - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shakespeare - no standard class, in enwiki * (other?) This aspect has been discussed in a few topics, such as: * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Scdhcjurfi3fe96o * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:S6q53exrf5ir908w * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:S789qh0m321280v5 * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Rvrf5mi32feehqf3 and originally removed in {T67138} (and followup in {T69225}). * Parentheses are not stripped from East Asian languages because different characters are used https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tn0k9fjn0g8e9fpe We'd like to do it more precisely/judiciously, but without negatively affecting other re-users of extracts... - so we can't just re-use the `class="noexcerpt"` (e.g. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:IPAc-en |template:IPAc-en ]]) or `class="nopopups"` (e.g. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:H:IPA | template:H:IPA]]) without deeply understanding what those classes already cover. --- NOTE: Currently, `renderer.article` requests TextExtracts for plaintext excerpts and removes //everything// within brackets. Can anyone help us map out the existing uses of `class="noexcerpt"` and `class="nopopups"` ? Or suggest other ideas?

Identify specific parenthetical elements to exclude from Hovercards, e.g. `class="IPA"` for pronunciation templates, to let Hovercards be more specific in its content filtering. This is a followup from the decision to remove all parenthetical content - which was originally done because a few types of content can often take up a lot of characters in the first sentence, which made the hovercard/extract a lot less useful. Those types are: * pronunciation - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germany - At enwiki the template-family already contains `class="IPA"` * etymology - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology - no standard class, in enwiki * birth/death dates & location - e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shakespeare - no standard class, in enwiki * (other?) This aspect has been discussed in a few topics, such as: * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Scdhcjurfi3fe96o * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:S6q53exrf5ir908w * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:S789qh0m321280v5 * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Rvrf5mi32feehqf3 and originally removed in {T67138} (and followup in {T69225}). * Parentheses are not stripped from East Asian languages because different characters are used https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tn0k9fjn0g8e9fpe We'd like to do it more precisely/judiciously, but without negatively affecting other re-users of extracts... - so we can't just re-use the `class="noexcerpt"` (e.g. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:IPAc-en |template:IPAc-en ]]) or `class="nopopups"` (e.g. [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:H:IPA | template:H:IPA]]) without deeply understanding what those classes already cover. --- NOTE: Currently, `renderer.article` requests TextExtracts for plaintext excerpts and removes //everything// within brackets. Can anyone help us map out the existing uses of `class="noexcerpt"` and `class="nopopups"` ? Or suggest other ideas?