Change Details

**tl;dr** In many cases, looking at a map with lang=<local lang> shows less labels (and more fallbacks, mostly english) than looking at the same map without the i18n feature. Example Localized map with lang=zh: https://maps.wikimedia.org/?s=osm-intl-i18n&lang=zh#13/39.9122/116.3925 Original map of the same area: https://maps.wikimedia.org/#13/39.9122/116.3925 The guideline from OSM seem to be to provide `name:<local name>` AND `name:<local lang code>=<local name>` but the latter is not always provided so we end up falling back on many imperfect options instead of showing the local name. Since we don't have information about the language of the `name:` attribute I don't know how we can solve this. Maybe we can just accept that the data is not good enough but it feels like a regression when looking at a map with `lang=<local lang>`

**tl;dr** In many cases, looking at a map with lang=<local lang> shows less labels (and more fallbacks, mostly english) than looking at the same map without the i18n feature. Example Localized map with lang=zh: https://maps.wikimedia.org/?s=osm-intl-i18n&lang=zh#13/39.9122/116.3925 Original map of the same area: https://maps.wikimedia.org/#13/39.9122/116.3925 The guideline from OSM seem to be to provide `name=<local name>` AND `name:<local lang code>=<local name>` but the latter is not always provided so we end up falling back on many imperfect options instead of showing the local name. Since we don't have information about the language of the `name:` attribute I don't know how we can solve this. Maybe we can just accept that the data is not good enough but it feels like a regression when looking at a map with `lang=<local lang>`

**tl;dr** In many cases, looking at a map with lang=<local lang> shows less labels (and more fallbacks, mostly english) than looking at the same map without the i18n feature. Example Localized map with lang=zh: https://maps.wikimedia.org/?s=osm-intl-i18n&lang=zh#13/39.9122/116.3925 Original map of the same area: https://maps.wikimedia.org/#13/39.9122/116.3925 The guideline from OSM seem to be to provide `name:=<local name>` AND `name:<local lang code>=<local name>` but the latter is not always provided so we end up falling back on many imperfect options instead of showing the local name. Since we don't have information about the language of the `name:` attribute I don't know how we can solve this. Maybe we can just accept that the data is not good enough but it feels like a regression when looking at a map with `lang=<local lang>`