Change Details

See also {T49721}, which may overlap/duplicate. Before the switch to tool labs (am I using the right jargon?) we had a nifty little tool on the English wikipedia that was much superior to what we have now under Top 50 contributors. (https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/articleinfo.py?page=User_talk:Ottawahitech&server=enwiki) By a simple click of a button one could check out ALL editors who ever edited a page sorted 8 different ways. This is useful when trying to gauge the activity level of w:WP:WikiProjects, and comes in real handy for someone like me who only very occasionally participates on a talkpage, but when they do want to have some background on the potential audience before making a total fool out of themselves. The tool displayed the list of editors who had participated on the page. There were 4 columns, each of which could be sorted front-to-back and vice verse: * user ID * number of edits to the page * date of first edit * date of last edit It was quick and rarely (if ever) failed, while the tool we have now lists only the top 50 editors, cannot be sorted, and is broken a lot. Thanks for considering this proposal. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC) This card tracks a proposal from the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey This proposal received 18 support votes, and was ranked #47 out of 107 proposals. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Editing#Page_contributors **Details** * Primary Mentor : * Secondary Mentor : <add yourself> * Other mentors: //(optional, Phabricator username)// * Skills: <add> * Estimated project time for a senior contributor: <add> * Microtasks: <add_tasks>

See also {T49721}, which may overlap/duplicate. Before the switch to tool labs (am I using the right jargon?) we had a nifty little tool on the English wikipedia that was much superior to what we have now under Top 50 contributors. (https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/articleinfo.py?page=User_talk:Ottawahitech&server=enwiki) By a simple click of a button one could check out ALL editors who ever edited a page sorted 8 different ways. This is useful when trying to gauge the activity level of w:WP:WikiProjects, and comes in real handy for someone like me who only very occasionally participates on a talkpage, but when they do want to have some background on the potential audience before making a total fool out of themselves. The tool displayed the list of editors who had participated on the page. There were 4 columns, each of which could be sorted front-to-back and vice verse: * user ID * number of edits to the page * date of first edit * date of last edit It was quick and rarely (if ever) failed, while the tool we have now lists only the top 50 editors, cannot be sorted, and is broken a lot. Thanks for considering this proposal. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC) This card tracks a proposal from the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey This proposal received 18 support votes, and was ranked #47 out of 107 proposals. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Editing#Page_contributors **Details** * Primary Mentor : @Samtar * Secondary Mentor : <add yourself> * Other mentors: //(optional, Phabricator username)// * Skills: <add> * Estimated project time for a senior contributor: <add> * Microtasks: <add_tasks>

See also {T49721}, which may overlap/duplicate. Before the switch to tool labs (am I using the right jargon?) we had a nifty little tool on the English wikipedia that was much superior to what we have now under Top 50 contributors. (https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/articleinfo.py?page=User_talk:Ottawahitech&server=enwiki) By a simple click of a button one could check out ALL editors who ever edited a page sorted 8 different ways. This is useful when trying to gauge the activity level of w:WP:WikiProjects, and comes in real handy for someone like me who only very occasionally participates on a talkpage, but when they do want to have some background on the potential audience before making a total fool out of themselves. The tool displayed the list of editors who had participated on the page. There were 4 columns, each of which could be sorted front-to-back and vice verse: * user ID * number of edits to the page * date of first edit * date of last edit It was quick and rarely (if ever) failed, while the tool we have now lists only the top 50 editors, cannot be sorted, and is broken a lot. Thanks for considering this proposal. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC) This card tracks a proposal from the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey This proposal received 18 support votes, and was ranked #47 out of 107 proposals. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Editing#Page_contributors **Details** * Primary Mentor : @Samtar * Secondary Mentor : <add yourself> * Other mentors: //(optional, Phabricator username)// * Skills: <add> * Estimated project time for a senior contributor: <add> * Microtasks: <add_tasks>