Change Details

As I started working on it, I realized what we're building isn't really so much a "visual" mode as it is just adding a form. "Visual" implies [[ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WYSIWYG | WYSIWYG ]], as in you could click on the chart itself to add a label, etc. Looking at T425608 may illustrate the problem better. Even in source editing, you can get the same preview. So really, our work is just supplying a form in place of a JSON editor. ==== Proposal Rename the "Visual edit" tab to "Edit with form", like we did for #mediawiki-extensions-communityrequests to more accurately reflects what we're offering.

As I started working on it, I realized what we're building isn't really so much a "visual" mode as it is just adding a form. "Visual" implies [[ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WYSIWYG | WYSIWYG ]], as in you could click on the chart itself to add a label, etc. Looking at T425608 may illustrate the problem better. Even in source editing, you can get the same preview. So really, our work is just supplying a form in place of a JSON editor. ==== Acceptance criteria * Rename the "Visual edit" tab to "Edit with form", like we did for #mediawiki-extensions-communityrequests to more accurately reflects what we're offering.

As I started working on it, I realized what we're building isn't really so much a "visual" mode as it is just adding a form. "Visual" implies [[ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/WYSIWYG | WYSIWYG ]], as in you could click on the chart itself to add a label, etc. Looking at T425608 may illustrate the problem better. Even in source editing, you can get the same preview. So really, our work is just supplying a form in place of a JSON editor. ==== ProposalAcceptance criteria * Rename the "Visual edit" tab to "Edit with form", like we did for #mediawiki-extensions-communityrequests to more accurately reflects what we're offering.