Change Details

Date: 22 July 2016 Time: 12:30 UTC Type: skype, fallback IRC (channel #gsoc-catimages) Description: 13th meeting (Week 8) to discuss how to find a "sexy" number for MVP == Agenda: - Last run log: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AbdealiJKTravis/logs/newimages&oldid=202088732 on NewImages - Category:JPEG files (89.4301 %) - Category:Human faces (10.1554 %) == Minutes of the Meeting: - Discussed on the current achieved rate of categorization: - Category:JPEG files (89.4301 %): Nice but not to be included into calculation since too easy. Actually the question is why are not 100% of the files categorized according to their mime-type? Errors in the file format or file-metadata code? - Category:Human faces (10.1554 %): Nice. Can be used, but must not be the only working categorization. - Category:Unidentified people (9.9482 %): (belongs to the former one) - Template:Created with Adobe Photoshop (6.8394 %): Templates count as leaf node categories since the are high quality due to the possibility to adopt them with time according to changing needs. - Category:Graphics (6.8394 %): Has about 1% of error so we can reach 5% here. A good one too. - Template:GPS EXIF (3.9378 %): The geo tagging categories are very nice, but the percentage is a bit low. - Category:Black and white photographs (2.7979 %): Same. - Category:PDF files (2.7979 %): Usually not that high. - Category:Taken with Canon EOS 700D (2.5907 %): Ok. - Template:Created with GIMP (2.3834 %): Template again. - Category:SVG files (2.0725 %): Good one too. We should consider this one a bit more since the amount of SVG is up to increase. We should consider putting https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SVG_created_with_..._templates if possible. - Number of categories put per file is another important point for quality. Given the fact the we have a lot of file type cats we should look at these values by subtracting 1 for each entry: - 1 (50.8808 %): These - 2 (27.4611 %) - 3 (12.4352 %) - 4 (6.2176 %) - 5 (2.2798 %) - 6 (0.7254 %) - Summarized we can say that it should be realistic to have 3 cats for 5% of the files (excluding file type cats) as a goal. - We should have some more indicators and stats, as e.g. an entry stating whether a category is a leaf cat or not. - ...

Date: 22 July 2016 Time: 12:30 UTC Type: skype, fallback IRC (channel #gsoc-catimages) Description: 13th meeting (Week 9) to discuss how to find a "sexy" number for MVP == Agenda: - Last run log: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AbdealiJKTravis/logs/newimages&oldid=202088732 on NewImages - Category:JPEG files (89.4301 %) - Category:Human faces (10.1554 %) == Minutes of the Meeting: - Discussed on the current achieved rate of categorization: - Category:JPEG files (89.4301 %): Nice but not to be included into calculation since too easy. Actually the question is why are not 100% of the files categorized according to their mime-type? Errors in the file format or file-metadata code? - Category:Human faces (10.1554 %): Nice. Can be used, but must not be the only working categorization. - Category:Unidentified people (9.9482 %): (belongs to the former one) - Template:Created with Adobe Photoshop (6.8394 %): Templates count as leaf node categories since the are high quality due to the possibility to adopt them with time according to changing needs. - Category:Graphics (6.8394 %): Has about 1% of error so we can reach 5% here. A good one too. - Template:GPS EXIF (3.9378 %): The geo tagging categories are very nice, but the percentage is a bit low. - Category:Black and white photographs (2.7979 %): Same. - Category:PDF files (2.7979 %): Usually not that high. - Category:Taken with Canon EOS 700D (2.5907 %): Ok. - Template:Created with GIMP (2.3834 %): Template again. - Category:SVG files (2.0725 %): Good one too. We should consider this one a bit more since the amount of SVG is up to increase. We should consider putting https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SVG_created_with_..._templates if possible. - Number of categories put per file is another important point for quality. Given the fact the we have a lot of file type cats we should look at these values by subtracting 1 for each entry: - 1 (50.8808 %): These - 2 (27.4611 %) - 3 (12.4352 %) - 4 (6.2176 %) - 5 (2.2798 %) - 6 (0.7254 %) - Summarized we can say that it should be realistic to have 3 cats for 5% of the files (excluding file type cats) as a goal. - We should have some more indicators and stats, as e.g. an entry stating whether a category is a leaf cat or not. - ...

Date: 22 July 2016 Time: 12:30 UTC Type: skype, fallback IRC (channel #gsoc-catimages) Description: 13th meeting (Week 89) to discuss how to find a "sexy" number for MVP == Agenda: - Last run log: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AbdealiJKTravis/logs/newimages&oldid=202088732 on NewImages - Category:JPEG files (89.4301 %) - Category:Human faces (10.1554 %) == Minutes of the Meeting: - Discussed on the current achieved rate of categorization: - Category:JPEG files (89.4301 %): Nice but not to be included into calculation since too easy. Actually the question is why are not 100% of the files categorized according to their mime-type? Errors in the file format or file-metadata code? - Category:Human faces (10.1554 %): Nice. Can be used, but must not be the only working categorization. - Category:Unidentified people (9.9482 %): (belongs to the former one) - Template:Created with Adobe Photoshop (6.8394 %): Templates count as leaf node categories since the are high quality due to the possibility to adopt them with time according to changing needs. - Category:Graphics (6.8394 %): Has about 1% of error so we can reach 5% here. A good one too. - Template:GPS EXIF (3.9378 %): The geo tagging categories are very nice, but the percentage is a bit low. - Category:Black and white photographs (2.7979 %): Same. - Category:PDF files (2.7979 %): Usually not that high. - Category:Taken with Canon EOS 700D (2.5907 %): Ok. - Template:Created with GIMP (2.3834 %): Template again. - Category:SVG files (2.0725 %): Good one too. We should consider this one a bit more since the amount of SVG is up to increase. We should consider putting https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SVG_created_with_..._templates if possible. - Number of categories put per file is another important point for quality. Given the fact the we have a lot of file type cats we should look at these values by subtracting 1 for each entry: - 1 (50.8808 %): These - 2 (27.4611 %) - 3 (12.4352 %) - 4 (6.2176 %) - 5 (2.2798 %) - 6 (0.7254 %) - Summarized we can say that it should be realistic to have 3 cats for 5% of the files (excluding file type cats) as a goal. - We should have some more indicators and stats, as e.g. an entry stating whether a category is a leaf cat or not. - ...