Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deferred_changes, when a user's edit is deferred actively (i.e. in such a way that it is not visible to readers), the user should be notified. The user should also be notified when their edit is accepted, but that's covered by {T54510} (see T54510#2875256 for screenshot).
The implementation that's currently being worked on [[https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/316957|this patch]] looks like this:
{F5057490}
The first notification is shown for edits that were automatically deferred because they matches an AbuseFilter rule. The first secondary link ("AbuseFilter") links to a documentation page about AbuseFilter (if the edit was deferred by ORES, the first secondary link will say "ORES" and link to a documentation page about ORES), and the second one ("Help") links to a documentation page about deferred change.
The second notification is shown for edits that were deferred by a bot (or human). The first secondary link is the user who deferred the edit.
=Notification Creation Form=
Filling out this form will help developers and product people understand your idea and will provide the information required to implement it. To see examples of the types of answers required, [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Notifications/Document_a_new_notification_type#Information_required | have a look at this sample form ]]. To understand unfamiliar terms, [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Notifications/Glossary | visit the glossary. ]]
==Basic information==
- **Purpose of the notification**: Inform users that their edit has been actively deferred.
- **Notification name**: Active Deferral
- **What triggers notification?:** !!//[This needs to be fully specified.]//!!
- **"Notice" or "Alert"?: ** Alert
- **Notification type (standard, bundled, expandable bundle): ** !!//??//!!
==Wording==
For a single message
-- **header:** Publication of your edit on Pagename was deferred, pending review.
-- **body: ** Screening software found a possible problem. !!//[Is there anything the user can say or do? If so, this would be a good place to suggest it.]//!!
for Bundled Messages
-- **main, bundling message: **
-- **subsidiary, bundled message: **
==Links==
- **primary link target: **
- **primary link label: **
- **#1 secondary link target:**
- **#1 secondary link label: **
- **#2 secondary link target:**
- **#2 secondary link label:**
==Icon==
- **icon name: ** deferred edit
- **Link to graphic/example:** https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F5059457