Change Details

Develop: [] A working definition for "moderation activity" that meets [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_and_Decision_Science/Data_glossary#Essential_metrics | essential metric criteria ]] [] A working definition for "moderator" based on the "moderation activity" that meets essential metric criteria **Scope for this task** - Only consider Wikipedia moderation activity. - It is ideal that the definition works for all Wikipedia languages. However, if you run into challenges that makes scaling to all languages in one quarter hard, it is okay to scale down. Follow the escalation process below. **Draft desired output** At the delivery time, and for the languages that you can offer the working definitions, we should be able to know: - if an edit is a moderation related edit and if so what kind of moderation it is. - who are the moderators using the previous information. **How to escalate** Your Key Result owner is the person you should escalate to if questions come up with regards to scaling down the work or if you run into resourcing questions or challenges. At the moment, this hypothesis is planned to fold under SDS 1.2 (answer strategic research questions). Please stay tuned for more information on this front. -- Leila

Develop: [] A working definition for "moderation activity" that meets [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_and_Decision_Science/Data_glossary#Essential_metrics | essential metric criteria ]] [] A working definition for "moderator" based on the "moderation activity" that meets essential metric criteria **Scope for this task** - Only consider Wikipedia moderation activity. - It is ideal that the definition works for all Wikipedia languages. However, if you run into challenges that makes scaling to all languages in one quarter hard, it is okay to scale down. Follow the escalation process below. **Draft desired output** At the delivery time, and for the languages that you can offer the working definitions, we should be able to know: - if an edit is a moderation related edit and if so what kind of moderation it is. - who are the moderators using the previous information. **How to escalate** Your Key Result owner is the person you should escalate to if questions come up with regards to scaling down the work or if you run into resourcing questions or challenges. At the moment, this hypothesis is planned to fold under SDS 1.2 (answer strategic research questions). Please stay tuned for more information on this front. -- Leila **Stakeholder** There are multiple groups and people who will benefit from this work and who can/should be consulted for this work. The Stakeholder whose input is needed for scoping and will need to sign off the work at the end of the quarter is @MMiller_WMF who has asked for this work to advance WE 1.3 (in this FY and in the future ones).

Develop: [] A working definition for "moderation activity" that meets [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_and_Decision_Science/Data_glossary#Essential_metrics | essential metric criteria ]] [] A working definition for "moderator" based on the "moderation activity" that meets essential metric criteria **Scope for this task** - Only consider Wikipedia moderation activity. - It is ideal that the definition works for all Wikipedia languages. However, if you run into challenges that makes scaling to all languages in one quarter hard, it is okay to scale down. Follow the escalation process below. **Draft desired output** At the delivery time, and for the languages that you can offer the working definitions, we should be able to know: - if an edit is a moderation related edit and if so what kind of moderation it is. - who are the moderators using the previous information. **How to escalate** Your Key Result owner is the person you should escalate to if questions come up with regards to scaling down the work or if you run into resourcing questions or challenges. At the moment, this hypothesis is planned to fold under SDS 1.2 (answer strategic research questions). Please stay tuned for more information on this front. -- Leila **Stakeholder** There are multiple groups and people who will benefit from this work and who can/should be consulted for this work. The Stakeholder whose input is needed for scoping and will need to sign off the work at the end of the quarter is @MMiller_WMF who has asked for this work to advance WE 1.3 (in this FY and in the future ones).