* Name of the software:
** LiquidThreads
* Link to code repository of the software:
** https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/mediawiki/extensions/LiquidThreads/
* Link to homepage of the software (if existing):
** https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:LiquidThreads
* Succinct problem statement to give context for why the review was initiated:
LiquidThreads is unmaintained software.
It’s used by < 9 pages on en.wiktionary, 8 on wikinews , 7 on hu wikipedia, 5 on wikibooks, 0 on sv wikisource. If that low usage is not an indication of an extension that should be removed from production I’m not sure what is.
I'm not sure if the pages that are using it need to be preserved and if so how that should be done (can these be imported to flow?)
https://sv.wikisource.org/w/index.php?sort=relevance&search=%23useliquidthreads&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&searchengineselect=mediawiki&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns90=1&ns91=1&ns92=1&ns93=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns102=1&ns103=1&ns104=1&ns105=1&ns106=1&ns107=1&ns108=1&ns109=1&ns110=1&ns111=1&ns114=1&ns115=1&ns116=1&ns117=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1
https://pt.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?sort=relevance&search=%23useliquidthreads&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&searchengineselect=mediawiki&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns90=1&ns91=1&ns92=1&ns93=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns102=1&ns103=1&ns104=1&ns105=1&ns106=1&ns107=1&ns108=1&ns109=1&ns110=1&ns111=1&ns114=1&ns115=1&ns116=1&ns117=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1
https://hu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?sort=relevance&search=%23useliquidthreads&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&searchengineselect=mediawiki&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns90=1&ns91=1&ns92=1&ns93=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns102=1&ns103=1&ns104=1&ns105=1&ns106=1&ns107=1&ns108=1&ns109=1&ns110=1&ns111=1&ns114=1&ns115=1&ns116=1&ns117=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1
https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?sort=relevance&search=%23useliquidthreads&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&searchengineselect=mediawiki&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns90=1&ns91=1&ns92=1&ns93=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns102=1&ns103=1&ns104=1&ns105=1&ns106=1&ns107=1&ns108=1&ns109=1&ns110=1&ns111=1&ns114=1&ns115=1&ns116=1&ns117=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1
* Current entry in [mw:Developers/Maintainers](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers):
** Listed Code Steward:
** Listed Maintainer:
** Listed In-training:
* Number, severity, and age of known and confirmed security issues:
**
* Was it a cause of production outages or incidents? List them:
**
* Does it have sufficient hardware resources for now and the near future (to take into account expected usage growth)?
**
* Is it a frequent cause of monitoring alerts that need action, and are they addressed timely and appropriately?
**
* When it was first deployed to Wikimedia production:
**
* Usage statistics based on audience(s) served:
**
* Code changes committed in last 1, 3, 6, and 12 months:
**
* Reliance on outdated platforms (e.g. operating systems):
**
* Number of developers who committed code in the last 1, 3, 6, and 12 months:
**
* Number and age of open patches:
**
* Number and age of open bugs:
**
* Number of known dependencies:
**
* Is there a replacement/alternative for the feature? Is there a plan for a replacement?
**
* Submitter's recommendation (what do you propose be done?):
**