Change Details

The closing of a long overdue RfC[1], Consensus seemed to go with removal of de-formal from Wikidata. Main reason was lack of usage and just different ways of how to address people. The RfC also had one view in the deletion of informal Netherlands but compared to other participation, consensus cannot be drawn from that. [1]https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Labels_and_descriptions_in_language_variants -------------------------- **Version**: wmf-deployment **See Also**: {T39459}

The closing of a long overdue RfC[1], Consensus seemed to go with removal of de-formal from Wikidata. Main reason was lack of usage and just different ways of how to address people. The RfC also had one view in the deletion of informal Netherlands but compared to other participation, consensus cannot be drawn from that. [1]https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Labels_and_descriptions_in_language_variants **See Also**: {T39459}

The closing of a long overdue RfC[1], Consensus seemed to go with removal of de-formal from Wikidata. Main reason was lack of usage and just different ways of how to address people. The RfC also had one view in the deletion of informal Netherlands but compared to other participation, consensus cannot be drawn from that. [1]https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Labels_and_descriptions_in_language_variants -------------------------- **Version**: wmf-deployment **See Also**: {T39459}