Change Details

Recently, the [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Primary_sources_tool | Primary sources tool ]] encountered some issues. ([[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team#Primary_Sources_tool_down | report ]]) The talk page on Wikidata doesn't show a lot of activity or a clear overview of who's maintaining the tool. I contacted both Marco Fossati and Sebastian Schaffert, who have been involved in the development at some point, but both pointed me to each other. Are there other people maintaining the tool that I'm not aware of? Are there other people willing to take part in maintaining the tool? Should we consider this tool as 'orphan' and what's the process in that case?

Recently, the [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Primary_sources_tool | Primary sources tool ]] encountered some issues. ([[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team/Archive/2019/11#Primary_Sources_tool_down | report ]]) The talk page on Wikidata doesn't show a lot of activity or a clear overview of who's maintaining the tool. I contacted both Marco Fossati and Sebastian Schaffert, who have been involved in the development at some point, but both pointed me to each other. Are there other people maintaining the tool that I'm not aware of? Are there other people willing to take part in maintaining the tool? Should we consider this tool as 'orphan' and what's the process in that case?

Recently, the [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Primary_sources_tool | Primary sources tool ]] encountered some issues. ([[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team/Archive/2019/11#Primary_Sources_tool_down | report ]]) The talk page on Wikidata doesn't show a lot of activity or a clear overview of who's maintaining the tool. I contacted both Marco Fossati and Sebastian Schaffert, who have been involved in the development at some point, but both pointed me to each other. Are there other people maintaining the tool that I'm not aware of? Are there other people willing to take part in maintaining the tool? Should we consider this tool as 'orphan' and what's the process in that case?