**Steps to replicate the issue** (include links if applicable):
* Vote in a SecurePoll poll, e.g. [[ https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:SecurePoll/vote/435&action=vote | Oct 2025 AELECT of zhwiki ]].
* On the top choices (RfA), pick at least one `-1`/`+1` (oppose/support) and leave some as `0` (neutral).
* Submit your vote.
**What happens?**:
* Inspect its source code, and you will see an `ul.securepoll-vote-result-no-vote` embedded directly inside `ul.securepoll-vote-result-options` as its direct descendant.
**What should have happened instead?**:
* `ul.securepoll-vote-result-no-vote` list should be outside and sit alongside `ul.securepoll-vote-result-options`. Per T22023, it is intended to separate the two lists.
**Software version** (on `Special:Version` page; skip for WMF-hosted wikis like Wikipedia): zhwiki
**Other information** (browser name/version, screenshots, etc.):
* It is also found that the username of Hamish, the RfIA candidate, may disappear if a vote is cast on their RfIA. It seems unrelated, but is noted here to avoid confusion.
* (Done with test data) test votes on both RfA and RfIA. Note that the bullet point of RfIA is missing - that is caused by the combination of CSS hacks and this bug. {F66742061}
* (Done with test data) Test votes with only one `0` on the RfA side. It has the same problem as the RfIA bullet point. {F66742064}