Change Details

This card tracks a proposal that's currently part of the Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey The Wishlist Survey voting phase lasts until Dec 14th. After the voting has concluded, the top proposals will form the backlog for the Community Tech team to investigate and address. **Proposal**: At Wikidata several reports have been produced that are about quality issues at Wikipedia. They can be anything from likely incorrect data vis a vis Wikidata, missing data or reports on the demise of people. Such lists do not get attention and consequently at Wikidata people indicate that they are not willing to consider the quality of any Wikipedia. Wikipedia is considered a black box and it is not interested in its own quality. With proper visibility for such reports we may get cooperation going. It will enhance quality in any and all of our projects. There are three things needed: * a platform on every Wikidata linked wiki for such issues * a mechanism to regularly update the list * a workflow for each issue —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GerardM (talk) 20 November 2015 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Wikidata#Visibility_for_quality_issues

At Wikidata several reports have been produced that are about quality issues at Wikipedia. They can be anything from likely incorrect data vis a vis Wikidata, missing data or reports on the demise of people. Such lists do not get attention and consequently at Wikidata people indicate that they are not willing to consider the quality of any Wikipedia. Wikipedia is considered a black box and it is not interested in its own quality. With proper visibility for such reports we may get cooperation going. It will enhance quality in any and all of our projects. There are three things needed: * a platform on every Wikidata linked wiki for such issues * a mechanism to regularly update the list * a workflow for each issue —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GerardM (talk) 20 November 2015 This card tracks a proposal from the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey This proposal received 3 support votes, and was ranked #93 out of 107 proposals. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Wikidata#Visibility_for_quality_issues

This card tracks a proposal that's currently part of the Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey The Wishlist Survey voting phase lasts until Dec 14th. After the voting has concluded, the top proposals will form the backlog for the Community Tech team to investigate and address. **Proposal**: At Wikidata several reports have been produced that are about quality issues at Wikipedia. They can be anything from likely incorrect data vis a vis Wikidata, missing data or reports on the demise of people. Such lists do not get attention and consequently at Wikidata people indicate that they are not willing to consider the quality of any Wikipedia. Wikipedia is considered a black box and it is not interested in its own quality. With proper visibility for such reports we may get cooperation going. It will enhance quality in any and all of our projects. There are three things needed: * a platform on every Wikidata linked wiki for such issues * a mechanism to regularly update the list * a workflow for each issue —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GerardM (talk) 20 November 2015 This card tracks a proposal from the 2015 Community Wishlist Survey: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey This proposal received 3 support votes, and was ranked #93 out of 107 proposals. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Wikidata#Visibility_for_quality_issues