Change Details

The English version of the `"nbytes"` message is `""$1 {{PLURAL:$1|byte|bytes}}""`. If I pass in a fractional number of bytes (not that that makes any sense for this particular example, but in general numerical parameters might take non-integers), and this number is between 1 and 2, PHP and JS behave differently: PHP correctly chooses the plural form: ``` > echo wfMessage('nbytes')->numParams(1.2); 1.2 bytes ``` But JS incorrectly chooses the singular form: ``` > mw.msg('nbytes', 1.2) "1.2 byte" ``` This only happens for numbers between 1 and 2 (maybe the number is being converted to an integer before it's tested against the plural rules?). I realize that in some languages this might be correct behavior. but in English it isn't.

The English version of the `"nbytes"` message is `"$1 {{PLURAL:$1|byte|bytes}}"`. If I pass in a fractional number of bytes (not that that makes any sense for this particular example, but in general numerical parameters might take non-integers), and this number is between 1 and 2, PHP and JS behave differently: PHP correctly chooses the plural form: ``` > echo wfMessage('nbytes')->numParams(1.2); 1.2 bytes ``` But JS incorrectly chooses the singular form: ``` > mw.msg('nbytes', 1.2) "1.2 byte" ``` This only happens for numbers between 1 and 2 (maybe the number is being converted to an integer before it's tested against the plural rules?). I realize that in some languages this might be correct behavior. but in English it isn't.

The English version of the `"nbytes"` message is `""`"$1 {{PLURAL:$1|byte|bytes}}""`"`. If I pass in a fractional number of bytes (not that that makes any sense for this particular example, but in general numerical parameters might take non-integers), and this number is between 1 and 2, PHP and JS behave differently: PHP correctly chooses the plural form: ``` > echo wfMessage('nbytes')->numParams(1.2); 1.2 bytes ``` But JS incorrectly chooses the singular form: ``` > mw.msg('nbytes', 1.2) "1.2 byte" ``` This only happens for numbers between 1 and 2 (maybe the number is being converted to an integer before it's tested against the plural rules?). I realize that in some languages this might be correct behavior. but in English it isn't.