Change Details

People who decide //not// to add a reference when Edit Check prompts them to are prompted to offer a reason as to why they made this choice: {F37135280} This task involves the work with determining how/where the software will log these responses. === Open question(s) - [ ] 1. How will we log when people engage with this view in some way (read: when they take an action to explicitly acknowledge that they've decided not to include a reference)? //This information will affect how we go about evaluating the impact of Edit Check. Reason: we are currently considering someone explicitly declining to add a reference and also explaining why as a positive outcome.// === Done - [ ] Answers to all `Open questions` are documented

People who decide //not// to add a reference when Edit Check prompts them to are prompted to offer a reason as to why they made this choice: {F37135280} This task involves the work with determining how/where the software will log these responses. === Story As an experienced volunteer who is reviewing an edit wherein they notice someone added new content //without// including a corresponding reference, I'd like to know **A)** if the person who made this edit explicitly decided to excluded a reference //and// **B)** what caused them to make such a decision //so that// I can decide what – if anything – I'll do in response (e.g. `Revert, `Thank`, look for a source myself, write on the person who made the edit's talk page, etc.) === Open question(s) - [ ] 1. How will we log when people engage with this view in some way (read: when they take an action to explicitly acknowledge that they've decided not to include a reference)? //This information will affect how we go about evaluating the impact of Edit Check. Reason: we are currently considering someone explicitly declining to add a reference and also explaining why as a positive outcome.// === Done - [ ] Answers to all `Open questions` are documented

People who decide //not// to add a reference when Edit Check prompts them to are prompted to offer a reason as to why they made this choice: {F37135280} This task involves the work with determining how/where the software will log these responses. === Story As an experienced volunteer who is reviewing an edit wherein they notice someone added new content //without// including a corresponding reference, I'd like to know **A)** if the person who made this edit explicitly decided to excluded a reference //and// **B)** what caused them to make such a decision //so that// I can decide what – if anything – I'll do in response (e.g. `Revert, `Thank`, look for a source myself, write on the person who made the edit's talk page, etc.) === Open question(s) - [ ] 1. How will we log when people engage with this view in some way (read: when they take an action to explicitly acknowledge that they've decided not to include a reference)? //This information will affect how we go about evaluating the impact of Edit Check. Reason: we are currently considering someone explicitly declining to add a reference and also explaining why as a positive outcome.// === Done - [ ] Answers to all `Open questions` are documented