Change Details

>>! In T54932#1656171, @Reedy wrote: > I just came across enwikisource.logging_pre_1_10, which has over 130k rows > > It wouldn't surprise me if there's similar tables on other wikis Can we have a look for any tables with "pre_" in the name, as those would be backup tables that can go too Deletion progress: * s2 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s3 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s4 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s5 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s6 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s7 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw

>>! In T54932#1656171, @Reedy wrote: > I just came across enwikisource.logging_pre_1_10, which has over 130k rows > > It wouldn't surprise me if there's similar tables on other wikis Can we have a look for any tables with "pre_" in the name, as those would be backup tables that can go too Deletion progress: * s2 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s3 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s4 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s5 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s6 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s7 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw

>>! In T54932#1656171, @Reedy wrote: > I just came across enwikisource.logging_pre_1_10, which has over 130k rows > > It wouldn't surprise me if there's similar tables on other wikis Can we have a look for any tables with "pre_" in the name, as those would be backup tables that can go too Deletion progress: * s2 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s3 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s4 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s5 ** [] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s6 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw * s7 ** [x] eqiad ** [x] codfw