Change Details

==== User story //As a voter, I should be able to rank candidates as per my choice in the voting UI for a Single Transferable vote.// ==== Tentative mock {F34450344, width=200} ==== Acceptance criteria * Different voters should be shown candidates in different, randomized orders in a dropdown UI. The order of candidates should be consistent throughout the voting form. * Default selected preference is "Select a candidate". This string is translatable. * Voters should be able to sequentially rank the candidates in their order of preference. For example, a voter can select their first, second and third preference but cannot select their first and third preference only. This would result in an error with the message: //All preferences must be selected in sequential order.// * No candidate can be selected twice. If a candidate is selected twice this should result in an error and the form should not submit. The form data will not be lost. Error message: //Candidates cannot be be selected multiple times in the ranking.// * Voters do not need to mandatorily rank all candidates. They may rank as many candidates as they wish (minimum one). ==== Note We'll tackle the disabled options in the dropdowns in a follow-up task.

==== User story //As a voter, I should be able to rank candidates as per my choice in the voting UI for a Single Transferable vote.// ==== Mock |Normal|Missing preferences error state|Duplicate preferences error state| |---|---|---| |{F34469851,width=200}|{F34469854,width=200}|{F34469857,width=200}| ==== Acceptance criteria * Different voters should be shown options in different, randomized orders in a dropdown UI. The order of candidates should be consistent throughout the voting form. ** The order should also be consistent if the form is submitted and the page is reloaded due to an error. * Default selected preference is "Select an option". This string is translatable. * Voters should be able to sequentially rank the options in their order of preference. For example, a voter can select their first, second and third preference but cannot select their first and third preference only. This would result in an error with the message: //Preferences must be selected in sequential order. // (See mock for details) * No option can be selected twice. If an option is selected twice this should result in an error and the form should not submit. The form data will not be lost. Error message: //Options can’t be selected multiple times when ranking.// * Voters do not need to mandatorily rank all options. They may rank as many candidates as they wish (minimum one). ==== Note We'll tackle the disabled options in the dropdowns in a follow-up task.

==== User story //As a voter, I should be able to rank candidates as per my choice in the voting UI for a Single Transferable vote.// ==== Tentative mockMock {F34450344, width=200}|Normal|Missing preferences error state|Duplicate preferences error state| |---|---|---| |{F34469851,width=200}|{F34469854,width=200}|{F34469857,width=200}| ==== Acceptance criteria * Different voters should be shown candidateoptions in different, randomized orders in a dropdown UI. The order of candidates should be consistent throughout the voting form. ** The order should also be consistent if the form is submitted and the page is reloaded due to an error. * Default selected preference is "Select a candidate"an option". This string is translatable. * Voters should be able to sequentially rank the candidatesoptions in their order of preference. For example, a voter can select their first, second and third preference but cannot select their first and third preference only. This would result in an error with the message: //All p//Preferences must be selected in sequential order.// // (See mock for details) * No candidateoption can be selected twice. If a candidaten option is selected twice this should result in an error and the form should not submit. The form data will not be lost. Error message: //CandidateOptions cannot ben’t be selected multiple times in thewhen ranking.// * Voters do not need to mandatorily rank all candidatesoptions. They may rank as many candidates as they wish (minimum one). ==== Note We'll tackle the disabled options in the dropdowns in a follow-up task.