Change Details

When we analysed Nuke last year (T341564) we discovered that it is very hard to pull useful data about how, when, and where Nuke is used. We had to take the [[ https://github.com/wikimedia-research/moderator-tools-FY24/blob/main/%5BT341564%5D%20nuke_usage_analysis/nuke_usage_analysis.ipynb | hacky approach ]] of looking at edit summary texts, including pulling string translations for comparison. It would be great if we could more easily identify deletion actions associated with Nuke. Perhaps a Tag or Nuke Log could be helpful approaches.

When we analysed Nuke last year (T341564) we discovered that it is very hard to pull useful data about how, when, and where Nuke is used. We had to take the [[ https://github.com/wikimedia-research/moderator-tools-FY24/blob/main/%5BT341564%5D%20nuke_usage_analysis/nuke_usage_analysis.ipynb | hacky approach ]] of looking at edit summary texts, including pulling string translations for comparison. It looks like some other tools (e.g. Twinkle) use Tags in the deletion log to identify deletions performed with them. We could add a Nuke tag to identify deletions performed by Nuke.

When we analysed Nuke last year (T341564) we discovered that it is very hard to pull useful data about how, when, and where Nuke is used. We had to take the [[ https://github.com/wikimedia-research/moderator-tools-FY24/blob/main/%5BT341564%5D%20nuke_usage_analysis/nuke_usage_analysis.ipynb | hacky approach ]] of looking at edit summary texts, including pulling string translations for comparison. It would be great if we could more easily identify deletion acIt looks like some other tools (e.g. Twinkle) use Tags in the deletion log to identify deletions associatperformed with Nukethem. Perhaps a Tag orWe could add a Nuke Log could be helpful approachestag to identify deletions performed by Nuke.