Proposal for WikidataCon 2019 -> not presented see also
* Blog about template [[ https://diff.wikimedia.org/2021/01/14/automatically-maintained-citations-with-wikidata-and-cite-q/ | Cite_Q ]]
* Swedish [[ https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malldiskussion:Cite_Q | template Cite_Q ]] and the vision to have all sources in Wikidata
____
I think we need to try formalize better the **TRUST** of sources used. My comment at [[ https://media.ccc.de/v/wikidatacon2017-10003-wikidata_state_of_the_project#t=2520 | Wikidata conf Q & A 2017 at 42 min ]] and question to [[ https://youtu.be/VdAc0JReVSw?t=2450 | Denny Vrandečić ]]
Lesson learned
# Adding [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P3217 | SBL Property 3217 ]] is that +7500 imported external identifiers has in [[ http://tinyurl.com/y9mz8u3d | WIkipedia articles in +200 languages ]] --> that if [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P3217 | Property 3217 ]] should be trusted we need to formalize this so a reader easy get an understanding of the quality/trust also if this source is unknown
# {T200668} [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Salgo60/ListeriaNobelData3 | Wikidata <-> Nobelprize.org ]] we have an external datasource with maybe good trust but no provenance and in Wikidata we have sources for most birth/death dates et al but as Nobel prize winners are from the whole world its difficult to understand the quality of sources you never have heard about before
**My conclusion:** Wikidata/Wikipedia is an excellent platform adding value/feedback/gathering knowledge/discuss the quality of sources and the TRUST we should have when using them. Wikidata is a tool to maybe do this in a machine readable way. Best would be if we also could combine this with data from external organisations.
Some scenarios I start to see were we need models for TRUST
# We have a very trusted source with a good QA process - example [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P3217 | SBL Property 3217 ]]
# We have a source that maybe is good it has been there for some 100 years BUT has **no Provenance** in the old world people trusted this catalogue but now with Linked data we can easy see that we have a mismatch between this catalogue and a catalogue with provienance - example federation with Nobel Prize see {T200668}
# We have a source with authorities but we start see antipatterns that they use Wikipedia as a source instead of the primary source
# Genealogy sites like GENI and Wikitree - could add excellent value were we have a highly skilled person doing the work with local knowledge but could also be a disaster based on an old unsourced import. Problem I see with genealogy sites is that many profiles dont get so many "eyes checking the quality" ( I guess nearly the same problem as with a small Wikipedia community) --> quaity problems
# New applications like iNaturalist makes it easy to add trust to community researched data [[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xENz1xRu0wI | video ]] / how [[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS3SfMCS4BQ | iNaturalist is used at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County ]]
{F28865087,width=900}
{F28864978,width=900}
* Diff [[ https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ASalgo60%2FListeriaNobelData3&type=revision&diff=1111851617&oldid=1098151695 | Wikidata and Nobelprize ]]
Why not make it easy for the reader and show featured sources
{F29378580,width=600}
=== See also
# {T222006}
# {T202530}
# [[ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikidataCon_2019/Submissions/We_need_a_better_model_communicating_quality_of_external_sources_in_Wikidata | WikidataCon_2019/Submissions/We_need_a_better_model_communicating_quality_of_external_sources_in_Wikidata ]]
# [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Questionable1 | CiteWatch ]]
# [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources|Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources]]
# [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard | Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard ]]
# [[ https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cite_Unseen | Cite_Unseen ]]
# Draft in Swedish about describing a highly trusted source WD Property3217 - [[ https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Salgo60/Source:SBL | Source:SBL in Swedish ]] - Google [[ https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fsv.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAnv%25C3%25A4ndare%3ASalgo60%2FSource%3ASBL | translated ]]
* Discovering Implicational Knowledge in Wikidata [[ https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.00916.pdf | pdf ]]