Change Details

Most issues from T171027 were fixed. We need to check if there are other smaller, less traffic wikis affected by: * Checking the size of recentchanges and its proportion of wb changes * Checking the number or rc-related errors (including watchslist) As mentioned on T171027, cawiki, frwiki, rowiki and maybe some s3 projects are probably good candidates to check, but we should test wikis as extensively as possible. Pending to be optimized: [] bgwiki s2 [] itwiki s2 [] svwiki s2 [] zhwiki s2 [x] bewiki s3 [x] cewiki s3 [x] dawiki s3 [x] hywiki s3 [x] ttwiki s3 [] frwiki s6 [x] arwiki s7 [x] cawiki s7 [x] huwiki s7 [x] rowiki s7 [x] ukwiki s7

Most issues from T171027 were fixed. We need to check if there are other smaller, less traffic wikis affected by: * Checking the size of recentchanges and its proportion of wb changes * Checking the number or rc-related errors (including watchslist) As mentioned on T171027, cawiki, frwiki, rowiki and maybe some s3 projects are probably good candidates to check, but we should test wikis as extensively as possible. Pending to be optimized: [] bgwiki s2 [] itwiki s2 [] svwiki s2 [] zhwiki s2 [x] bewiki s3 [x] cewiki s3 [x] dawiki s3 [x] hywiki s3 [x] ttwiki s3 [x] frwiki s6 [x] arwiki s7 [x] cawiki s7 [x] huwiki s7 [x] rowiki s7 [x] ukwiki s7

Most issues from T171027 were fixed. We need to check if there are other smaller, less traffic wikis affected by: * Checking the size of recentchanges and its proportion of wb changes * Checking the number or rc-related errors (including watchslist) As mentioned on T171027, cawiki, frwiki, rowiki and maybe some s3 projects are probably good candidates to check, but we should test wikis as extensively as possible. Pending to be optimized: [] bgwiki s2 [] itwiki s2 [] svwiki s2 [] zhwiki s2 [x] bewiki s3 [x] cewiki s3 [x] dawiki s3 [x] hywiki s3 [x] ttwiki s3 [x] frwiki s6 [x] arwiki s7 [x] cawiki s7 [x] huwiki s7 [x] rowiki s7 [x] ukwiki s7