By dividing the spectrum of ORES scores into discrete levels and labeling these in a way that makes their predictive value clear, enable users to effectively use the system to meet their reviewing needs. In the immediate future, this system will be used on the ERI revisions to Recent Changes and in the ReviewStream feed. At present, the proposed system looks like this:
**CONTRIBUTION QUALITY [Damaging]**
**Very likely good**
Edits with 90-100% probability of being helpful.
**Likely good**
Edits with 50-100% probability of being helpful.
**May have problems**
Edits with a 20-100% probability of being flawed or damaging.
**Likely have problems**
Edits with a 50-100% probability of being a flawed or damaging.
**Very likely have problems**
Edits with a 90-100% probability of being flawed or damaging.
**USER INTENT (PREDICTED) [Good Faith]**
**Very likely good faith**
Edits with 93-100% probability of being in good faith.
**Likely good faith**
Edits with 50-100% probability of being in good faith.
**Likely bad faith**
Edits with 50-100% probability of being in bad faith.
**Very likely bad faith**
Edits with 90-100% probability of being in bad faith.