Principal user story:
* As a re-user of Lexeme content in all languages, I want comprehensive coverage in as many languages as possible.
Secondary user stories:
* As a Lexeme editor, I want to help work on the most needed Lexemes in my language(s).
* As a community organiser, I want to know in what languages I should advocate for more contributions.
We should provide first-party, prominent encouragement of productive user behaviour, by measuring Lexeme language completeness, and providing listings of missing/incomplete Lexemes for editors (or tools for editors) to use to guide their efforts.
Starting corpora could include:
* existing Wikipedia / //etc.// articles in that language
* Official "basic word lists", such as the five cited lists compiled at [[https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Basic_English_combined_wordlist|simple:Wikipedia:Basic English combined wordlist]]
* Similar word frequency lists (perhaps via [[https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8893349|d:Q8893349 (Category:Linguistics lists)]])