====Problem to solve
Full site blocks are not always appropriate in all cases of user misconduct.
------
====Proposed solution
To retain constructive contributors who cause disruption on one page (e.g. contentious article page, user talk page of someone they constantly berate, etc.) we could give admins the ability to block them from editing one specific page.
------
====Proposed implementation
* On Special:Block, introduce a method to
* Block options should include:
** Page name (how should namespaces be treated? freeform field or like Move page?)
** Expiration of block
** Block reason
** If the block also apply to the page's talk page
* Block logs should display everywhere the current block displays (user page, Special:Block for the user, Special:Log, anywhere else?)
** Log should include `TIMESTAMP Admin-who-blocked (t|c|b) blocked BadApples (t|c) from editing the page Foobar with an expiration time of N (reason) (unblock | change block)`
* TBD if we should build a new page or extend Special:BlockList
* When a user attempts to edit the page, they should see a new type of block warning message which include information on their block (reason, expiration, etc.)
------
====Hyperlinks
* [[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Moderation_and_admin_tools#Enhanced_per-user.2C_per-article_protection_.2F_blocking|2015 Community Wishlist survey proposal]], where it received 52 support votes, and was ranked #14 out of 107 proposals.
* [[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_health_initiative/Per_user_page_block|Per user page block]] documentation on Meta Wiki