Change Details

**Represetations** Before: EN color After: EN colour Summary: ? Before: EN-GB colour, EN-US color After: EN-GB-colour Summary: ? Before: EN-GB colour After: EN-GB colour, EN-US color Summary: ? **Grammatical features** Before: Q666 (dative) After: Q777 (accusative) Summary: ? Before: Q666 (dative), Q888 (singular) After: Q666 (dative) Summary: ? Before: Q666 (dative) After: Q666 (dative), Q888 (singular) Summary: ? **Bonus question**: It's been decided once that when the user changes both representation(s) and grammatical feature(s), and then clicks save, the changes she made are stored as a single edit, thus there is a single edit summary to consider. Question then: How would the summary look in such a case? Hint: one couldn't refer to item/property changes AFAIK, as when e.g. changing the label, and the description, and then saving, there are two edits saved on the item/property, and each has an edit summary about the respective field.

**Represetations** Before: EN color After: EN colour Summary: Changed English representation of Form 1: colour Before: EN-GB colour, EN-US color After: EN-GB-colour Summary: Removed American English representation of Form 1: color Fall back to [en-gb] if we can't get the language name the same way we do it for terms. Before: EN-GB colour After: EN-GB colour, EN-US color Summary: Added American English representation of Form 1: color Fall back to [en-gb] if we can't get the language name the same way we do it for terms. **Grammatical features** Before: Q666 (dative) After: Q777 (accusative) Summary: Changed grammatical feature of Form 1: accusative (Q777) Before: Q666 (dative), Q888 (singular) After: Q666 (dative) Summary: Removed grammatical feature of Form 1: singular (Q888) Before: Q666 (dative) After: Q666 (dative), Q888 (singular) Summary: Added grammatical feature of Form 1: singular (Q888) **Bonus question**: It's been decided once that when the user changes both representation(s) and grammatical feature(s), and then clicks save, the changes she made are stored as a single edit, thus there is a single edit summary to consider. Question then: How would the summary look in such a case? Hint: one couldn't refer to item/property changes AFAIK, as when e.g. changing the label, and the description, and then saving, there are two edits saved on the item/property, and each has an edit summary about the respective field.

**Represetations** Before: EN color After: EN colour Summary: ?Changed English representation of Form 1: colour Before: EN-GB colour, EN-US color After: EN-GB-colour Summary: ?Removed American English representation of Form 1: color Fall back to [en-gb] if we can't get the language name the same way we do it for terms. Before: EN-GB colour After: EN-GB colour, EN-US color Summary: ?Added American English representation of Form 1: color Fall back to [en-gb] if we can't get the language name the same way we do it for terms. **Grammatical features** Before: Q666 (dative) After: Q777 (accusative) Summary: ?Changed grammatical feature of Form 1: accusative (Q777) Before: Q666 (dative), Q888 (singular) After: Q666 (dative) Summary: ?Removed grammatical feature of Form 1: singular (Q888) Before: Q666 (dative) After: Q666 (dative), Q888 (singular) Summary: ?Added grammatical feature of Form 1: singular (Q888) **Bonus question**: It's been decided once that when the user changes both representation(s) and grammatical feature(s), and then clicks save, the changes she made are stored as a single edit, thus there is a single edit summary to consider. Question then: How would the summary look in such a case? Hint: one couldn't refer to item/property changes AFAIK, as when e.g. changing the label, and the description, and then saving, there are two edits saved on the item/property, and each has an edit summary about the respective field.