Change Details

Please do not store Categorylinks/Templatelinks from .css and .js pages in Categorylinks table/Templatelinks table, because there are not shown on that page. (No 'catlinks' section/template will shown as normal wikitext). Thanks. Example: When scripting there can be code like '"[[Category:"+cat.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+cat.substring(1)+"]]"', this will produce a disadvantageous entry in 'Category:"+cat.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+cat.substring(1)+"'. Pagelinks table is useful to have backlinks and can find/support all usage of a script. I have no observation about Imagelinks table -------------------------- **Version**: unspecified **Severity**: enhancement

Please do not store Categorylinks/Templatelinks from .css and .js pages in Categorylinks table/Templatelinks table, because there are not shown on that page. (No 'catlinks' section/template will shown as normal wikitext). Thanks. Example: When scripting there can be code like `'"[[Category:"+cat.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+cat.substring(1)+"]]"'`, this will produce a disadvantageous entry in `'Category:"+cat.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+cat.substring(1)+"'`. Pagelinks table is useful to have backlinks and can find/support all usage of a script. I have no observation about Imagelinks table **See also** * {T34450} * {T10761}

Please do not store Categorylinks/Templatelinks from .css and .js pages in Categorylinks table/Templatelinks table, because there are not shown on that page. (No 'catlinks' section/template will shown as normal wikitext). Thanks. Example: When scripting there can be code like `'"[[Category:"+cat.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+cat.substring(1)+"]]"'`, this will produce a disadvantageous entry in `'Category:"+cat.substring(0,1).toUpperCase()+cat.substring(1)+"'`. Pagelinks table is useful to have backlinks and can find/support all usage of a script. I have no observation about Imagelinks table --------------------------**See also** **Version**: unspecified* {T34450} **Severity**: enhancement* {T10761}