Change Details

While demoing T399278 we found more small issues in the #wikieditor_2010 help panel. [] The ref list is indented very deep, wasting space and making it appear misaligned. [] Why do the examples need to contain a wiki link to begin with? The focus is on the ref syntax, not on links. Why not use a trivial plain text "book" as an example? [] The subref example could be more meaningful as well, e.g. talk about a "page" number. [] It looks like the subref number is displayed with a comma? That would be wrong.

While demoing T399278 we found more small issues in the #wikieditor_2010 help panel. [] The ref list is indented very deep, wasting space and making it appear misaligned. [x] Why do the examples need to contain a wiki link to begin with? The focus is on the ref syntax, not on links. Why not use a trivial plain text "book" as an example? [x] The subref example could be more meaningful as well, e.g. talk about a "page" number. [] It looks like the subref number is displayed with a comma? That would be wrong.

While demoing T399278 we found more small issues in the #wikieditor_2010 help panel. [] The ref list is indented very deep, wasting space and making it appear misaligned. [x] Why do the examples need to contain a wiki link to begin with? The focus is on the ref syntax, not on links. Why not use a trivial plain text "book" as an example? [x] The subref example could be more meaningful as well, e.g. talk about a "page" number. [] It looks like the subref number is displayed with a comma? That would be wrong.