This task involves the work of deciding:
1. If we'll tag edits Paste Check was activated within
2. How we'll tag these edits, if we decide to move forward with doing so
=== Stories
- As an experienced volunteer motivated to maintain the quality of content available on Wikipedia, I want to be able to identify edits that involve people adding new text they pasted from another source, so that I can review these edits mindful of the copyvio risks it might carry.
WARNING: if we move forward with introducing a tag of this sort, we need to think carefully about how/if to inform people who are editing that the changes they are making are being tagged in this way.
=== Requirements
# `editcheck-paste`: this tag would be applied to any ''published'' edit that includes //unmodified*// pasted text (regardless of its source and type)
# `editcheck-paste-HTML`: this tag would be applied to any ''published'' edit that includes //unmodified*// text pasted from HTML (T376306).
# `editcheck-paste-shown`: this tag would be applied to any ''published'' edit in which ≥1 Paste Check was shown.
=== Open question(s)
- [ ] 1. Which (if any) of the tags above will be `hidden` to start?
=== References
@matej_suchanek [helpfully raised the need for us to address this question](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist/Wishes/Warn_when_large_amount_of_content_has_been_copy-pasted/en). on meta via the Community Wishlist.