Change Details

There are two changes [[ https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malldiskussion:FMIS | to the selection of the lists ]] that should be considered. 1. There are many types of objects available in FMIS that are easy to find and probaly would look great on photos that are not part of the competition today. We would like to widen the scope so that they also can be part. Examples are bridges, industries, lighthouses and more. We believe that some could possibly even be worthy of inclusion even if the status is "Övrig kulturhistorisk lämning". 2. Some object types are extremely hard to find and take photos of. we should consider to exclude them in order to not frustrate and alienate people who want to be part of the competition, because of the risk that they give up if they fail after the first try. Example of type to remove would be "Stensättning" but we need further discussion with archaeologists at RAÄ. There are of course some practicalities around this even if we could come to a quick decision of the exact changes we like which we need to take into consideration for this years competition.

There are two changes [[ https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malldiskussion:FMIS | to the selection of the lists ]] that should be considered. 1. There are [[ https://www.raa.se/app/uploads/2014/10/L%C3%A4mningstypslistan_ver-4_1_20140930.pdf | many types ]] of objects available in FMIS that are easy to find and probaly would look great on photos that are not part of the competition today. We would like to widen the scope so that they also can be part. Examples are bridges, industries, lighthouses and more. We believe that some could possibly even be worthy of inclusion even if the status is "Övrig kulturhistorisk lämning". 2. Some object types are extremely hard to find and take photos of. we should consider to exclude them in order to not frustrate and alienate people who want to be part of the competition, because of the risk that they give up if they fail after the first try. Example of type to remove would be "Stensättning" but we need further discussion with archaeologists at RAÄ. There are of course some practicalities around this even if we could come to a quick decision of the exact changes we like which we need to take into consideration for this years competition.

There are two changes [[ https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malldiskussion:FMIS | to the selection of the lists ]] that should be considered. 1. There are [[ https://www.raa.se/app/uploads/2014/10/L%C3%A4mningstypslistan_ver-4_1_20140930.pdf | many types ]] of objects available in FMIS that are easy to find and probaly would look great on photos that are not part of the competition today. We would like to widen the scope so that they also can be part. Examples are bridges, industries, lighthouses and more. We believe that some could possibly even be worthy of inclusion even if the status is "Övrig kulturhistorisk lämning". 2. Some object types are extremely hard to find and take photos of. we should consider to exclude them in order to not frustrate and alienate people who want to be part of the competition, because of the risk that they give up if they fail after the first try. Example of type to remove would be "Stensättning" but we need further discussion with archaeologists at RAÄ. There are of course some practicalities around this even if we could come to a quick decision of the exact changes we like which we need to take into consideration for this years competition.