== Background
In {T212959} we confirmed that the new AMC tag exists for edits. To confirm that the tag exists for moderation actions as well (defined in T213461 ), we will have to QA separately in production.
== QA criteria
Confirm that when the following actions occurare executed in production from an AMC opted-in account, they are tagged accorwith both `advanced mobile edit` and `mobile web edit` in the correspondingly: public log:
- undo- undo: tags should show up in user contributions
- [[https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Parameters_to_index.php#rollback |rollback]]
- reviewing new pages (cf. Special:NewPagesFeed): tags should show up in user contributions
- blocking (Special:Blog, tag should show up in thelock): [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=block&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter= |block log]])
- unblocking (Special:Unblock, tag should show up in the): [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=block&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter= |block log]])
- deleting (tag should show up in the[[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MyPage&action=delete | example]]): [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=delete&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=|deletion log]])
- protecting pages (tag should show up in the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=protect&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=|protection log]])-- It's OK to leave out [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&offset=&limit=500&type=delete&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=restore|undeletions]] (and other particular kinds of actions logged in the deletion log, such as redirect overwrites) , as they are relatively rare and thus probably insignificant for the AP metric.
- mov- protecting pages ([[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MoveyPage, tag should show up in the&action=protect | example]]): [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=moveprotect&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=|moveprotection log]])
- thanks- moving pages ([[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MovePage/User:Tbayer_(WMF) |example]]): [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=move&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=|move log]]
-- thanks (analogous to T215477#5039143)
- Approving [[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Flagged_Revisions |pending changes]] (cf.: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=review&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter= |review log]]
-- It's OK to leave out the corresponding [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=review&user=&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter= |log on enwiki]])&subtype=unaccept|de-approving action]], as it is much rarer and thus probably insignificant for the AP metric.
-- Note that (per [[https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Flagged_Revisions#Flagged_Revisions_on_Wikimedia_projects |the documentation]]), this feature is only available on two of the three wikis from the initial AMC deployment (T217643), namely arwiki and idwiki.
- (enwiki-specific, may need to be postponed: reviewing new pages (cf. Special:NewPagesFeed)
- NB: We're not covering [[https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Patrolled_edits |patrolling actions]] at this point, although this might change later.
It would be great if the QA report could include links to resulting logs events. (Narrowing down the corresponding log to your own actions, by entering your user name under "Performer", should be sufficient.) This will make it easier for @Tbayer to check the result on the database side as well.
(Other reverts, i.e. those that are not made via either undo or rollback, should already be covered by the QA for normal edits, and thus do not need to be tested separately.)