**How will we know we are successful?**
The new features and improvements must prove how it contributes to the KR 1.1 of the Annual Plan:
Increase unreverted mobile contributions in the main article namespace on Wikipedias by 10%, averaged across a representative set of wikis.
Additionally, we estimate we can increase the average monthly edit count per editor from 4.9 to at least 5.5, bringing it closer to Android's 6.7 monthly average, and significantly higher than mobile web's monthly average edit rate of 4.2 edits per editor.
**Validation**
- Increase the average monthly edit count per unique editor from 4.9 to at least 5.5
- 10% Increase in unreverted mobile contributions in the main namespace
- 2000 articles enhanced using Suggested Edits
**Guardrails**
- Revert rate does not increase
- Geographic bias is not worsened
- Less than 5% of users report NSFW or offensive content
**Curiosities (nice to have)**
Are more users attempting edits?
How does this change with discoverability interventions?
Native Editor full page editing
Suggested Edits prominence
Are we seeing a difference in affordances engaged with for native editor?
Do we see a decrease in abandonment for folks using our native editor?
Do we see an increase in time spent with the native editor?
What impact does Geography have on the suggested edit interventions?
What impact does emphasizing captions and alt-text have on task completion and user satisfaction with feature?
**Target Quant Regions and Languages**
Spanish, French and Portuguese speakers in the Americas (North, South and Central) and Caribbean
Chinese speakers in North America
**Target Qualitative Audience**
Low Bandwidth Readers
Blind and Low Vision Users / Accessibility Experts
Moderators