Change Details

== What are we testing? Junior/Senior wants to talk about an article that no one else has started talking about yet⟶ seniors visits empty article talk This script tests for: - Starting a new discussion using the new article empty state - Linking - Posting - Being able to identify their post in context after posting == Who is being tested? Junior and Senior Contributors == What page are we testing an Empty Article Talk Page == Findings To be added after tests are logged

== What are we testing? Junior/Senior wants to talk about an article that no one else has started talking about yet⟶ seniors visits empty article talk This script tests for: - Starting a new discussion using the new article empty state - Linking - Posting - Being able to identify their post in context after posting == Who is being tested? Junior and Senior Contributors == What page are we testing an Empty Article Talk Page == Findings Average amount of time to correctly recognize that this page is some sort of message board: 8.4 seconds for desktop testers. 9.6 seconds for mobile testers. **Starting a new discussion using the new article empty state** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout ✅ 4 of 5 mobile users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout **Linking** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout ✅ 5 of 5 mobile users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout ⚠️ Almost all of the mobile testers struggled to add links (although ultimately were able to complete the task) " I wasn't sure the links were posting properly. That was easy to do, but confusing to confirm at first" UT-3 **Posting** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to successfully post their new topic/create the page. ✅ 5 of 5 mobile users were able to successfully post their new topic/create the page. One tester was a little thrown off by "add topic" vs. other posting language such as "Post" (UT-1) **Being able to identify their post in context after posting** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to identify their post in context after posting ✅ 5 of 5 mobile users were able to identify their post in context after posting Unexpected UI: "Maybe have a box more around the [topic container] so it could look like a thread." UT 2 "It is very generic and plain looking. It would be nice if the time and date were indented on a line (i feel like it would be easier to read). From what I'm used to on Wikipedia, it looks exactly as I'd expect it to." UT-4 "I was kind of expecting to see more like a headline and a click to open, I wasn't expecting to see it automatically. UT-9 Source mode issues: - several testers ended up in source mode (one way or another) and struggled with formatting, linking and posting.

== What are we testing? Junior/Senior wants to talk about an article that no one else has started talking about yet⟶ seniors visits empty article talk This script tests for: - Starting a new discussion using the new article empty state - Linking - Posting - Being able to identify their post in context after posting == Who is being tested? Junior and Senior Contributors == What page are we testing an Empty Article Talk Page == Findings To be added after tests are loggedAverage amount of time to correctly recognize that this page is some sort of message board: 8.4 seconds for desktop testers. 9.6 seconds for mobile testers. **Starting a new discussion using the new article empty state** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout ✅ 4 of 5 mobile users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout **Linking** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout ✅ 5 of 5 mobile users were able to start a new discussion using the new article empty state layout ⚠️ Almost all of the mobile testers struggled to add links (although ultimately were able to complete the task) " I wasn't sure the links were posting properly. That was easy to do, but confusing to confirm at first" UT-3 **Posting** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to successfully post their new topic/create the page. ✅ 5 of 5 mobile users were able to successfully post their new topic/create the page. One tester was a little thrown off by "add topic" vs. other posting language such as "Post" (UT-1) **Being able to identify their post in context after posting** ✅ 5 of 5 desktop users were able to identify their post in context after posting ✅ 5 of 5 mobile users were able to identify their post in context after posting Unexpected UI: "Maybe have a box more around the [topic container] so it could look like a thread." UT 2 "It is very generic and plain looking. It would be nice if the time and date were indented on a line (i feel like it would be easier to read). From what I'm used to on Wikipedia, it looks exactly as I'd expect it to." UT-4 "I was kind of expecting to see more like a headline and a click to open, I wasn't expecting to see it automatically. UT-9 Source mode issues: - several testers ended up in source mode (one way or another) and struggled with formatting, linking and posting.